Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23026788›Full record

ArticleAnnals of emergency medicine2013

Nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage in the setting of negative cranial computed tomography results: external validation of a clinical and imaging prediction rule.

Dustin G Mark, Yun-Yi Hung, Steven R Offerman, Adina S Rauchwerger, Mary E Reed, Uli Chettipally, David R Vinson, Dustin W Ballard, Kaiser Permanente CREST Network Investigators

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of emergency medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Subarachnoid haemorrhage.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2019
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Thunderclap headache.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2014
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Dustin G MarkDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, USA. dustin.g.mark@kp.org
Yun-Yi Hung
Steven R Offerman
Adina S Rauchwerger
Mary E Reed
Uli Chettipally
David R Vinson
Dustin W Ballard
Kaiser Permanente CREST Network Investigators
Kaiser Permanente · USKaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center · USKaiser Permanente Roseville Medical Center · USKaiser Permanente San Rafael Medical Center · USKaiser Permanente South Sacramento Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectiveClinical variables can reliably exclude a diagnosis of nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage in patients with negative cranial computed tomography (CT) results. We externally validated 2 decision rules with 100% reported sensitivity for a diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage, among patients undergoing lumbar puncture after a negative cranial CT result: (1) clinical rule: presence of any combination of age 40 years and older, neck pain or stiffness, loss of consciousness, or headache onset during exertion; and (2) imaging rule: cranial CT performed within 6 hours of headache onset.

methodsThis was a matched case-control study of patients presenting to 21 emergency departments between 2000 and 2011. Patients with a diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage as determined by lumbar puncture after a negative cranial CT result were screened for inclusion. A matched control cohort was selected among patients with a diagnosis of headache after negative cranial CT and lumbar puncture results.

resultsFifty-five cases of subarachnoid hemorrhage meeting inclusion criteria were identified, 34 (62%) of which were attributed to cerebral aneurysms. External validation of the clinical rule demonstrated a sensitivity of 97.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.6% to 99.7%), a specificity of 22.7% (95% CI 16.6% to 29.8%), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.13 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.61) for a diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage. External validation of the imaging rule revealed that 11 of 55 subarachnoid hemorrhage cases (20%) had negative cranial CT results for tests performed within 6 hours of headache onset.

conclusionThe clinical rule demonstrated useful Bayesian test characteristics when retrospectively validated against this patient cohort. The imaging rule, however, failed to identify 20% of subarachnoid hemorrhage patients with a negative cranial CT result.

Indexed as

Cause of DeathAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBayes TheoremBlood Chemical AnalysisCase-Control StudiesConfidence IntervalsEducation, Medical, ContinuingEmergency Service, HospitalFalse Negative ReactionsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID23026788
OpenAlexW2021673008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.