Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23026751›Full record

ReviewPhysiology (Bethesda, Md.)2012

Insight into DEG/ENaC channel gating from genetics and structure.

Amy L Eastwood, Miriam B Goodman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiology (Bethesda, Md.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Lipid Regulation of Mechanosensitive Ion Channels.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Structural basis for excitatory neuropeptide signaling.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Evolution of the Insect PPK Gene Family.Genome biology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A quantal code for touch intensity inThe Journal of general physiology · 2019
    Article
  19. Analyses of epithelial NaThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2019
    Article
  20. A NaThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amy L EastwoodDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. aeastwood@stanford.edu
Miriam B Goodman

Funding

Molecular Basis of Sensory Transduction in C. elegansR01NS047715 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOODMAN, MIRIAM B · 2004 to 2017
$4.9M
Force Clamp Systems for Evaluation of MechanotransductionR01EB006745 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOODMAN, MIRIAM B, PRUITT, BETH L · 2007 to 2014
$3.1M
Investigating the Molecular Basis of Mechanotransduction Channel GatingF32NS065718 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI EASTWOOD, AMY LYNN · 2009 to 2011
$144k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006745NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS065718NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS047715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The founding members of the superfamily of DEG/ENaC ion channel proteins are C. elegans proteins that form mechanosensitive channels in touch and pain receptors. For more than a decade, the research community has used mutagenesis to identify motifs that regulate gating. This review integrates insight derived from unbiased in vivo mutagenesis screens with recent crystal structures to develop new models for activation of mechanically gated DEGs.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsEpithelial Sodium ChannelsIon Channel GatingMembrane ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataPainTouchCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsDeg-1 protein, C elegansEpithelial Sodium ChannelsMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23026751
PMCPMC4012085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.