ReviewJournal of molecular and cellular cardiology2013
Decoding myocardial Ca²⁺ signals across multiple spatial scales: a role for sensitivity analysis.
Review in Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- In silico study of the effects of anti-arrhythmic drug treatment on sinoatrial node function for patients with atrial fibrillation.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Studying dyadic structure-function relationships: a review of current modeling approaches and new insights into CaClinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology · 2017Article
- There and back again: Iterating between population-based modeling and experiments reveals surprising regulation of calcium transients in rat cardiac myocytes.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2016Article
- The ryanodine receptor patchwork: knitting calcium spark dynamics.Biophysical journal · 2014Article
- Alterations in T-tubule and dyad structure in heart disease: challenges and opportunities for computational analyses.Cardiovascular research · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Numerous studies have employed mathematical modeling to quantitatively understand release of Ca(2+) from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) in the heart. Models have been used to investigate physiologically important phenomena such as triggering of SR Ca(2+) release by Ca(2+) entry across the cell membrane and spontaneous leak of Ca(2+) from the SR in quiescent heart cells. In this review we summarize studies that have modeled myocardial Ca(2+) at different spatial scales: the sub-cellular level, the cellular level, and the multicellular level. We discuss each category of models from the standpoint of parameter sensitivity analysis, a common simulation procedure that can generate quantitative, comprehensive predictions about how changes in conditions influence model output. We propose that this is a useful perspective for conceptualizing models, in part because a sensitivity analysis requires the investigator to define the relevant parameters and model outputs. This procedure therefore helps to illustrate the capabilities and limitations of each model. We further suggest that in future studies, sensitivity analyses will aid in simplifying complex models and in suggesting experiments to differentiate between competing models built with different assumptions. We conclude with a discussion of unresolved questions that are likely to be addressed over the next several years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.