ArticleAmerican journal of health behavior2012
Perceived risk of cervical cancer in Appalachian women.
Article in American journal of health behavior, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Risk perception of non-communicable diseases: A systematic review on its assessment and associated factors.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Uptake, Knowledge, and Acceptance for Youth: A Systematic Review of Appalachia.Journal of community health · 2018Pooled it
- Article
- An updated measure for investigating basic knowledge of Alzheimer's disease in underserved rural settings.Aging & mental health · 2020Article
- Disparity in rates of HPV infection and cervical cancer in underserved US populations.Frontiers in bioscience (Scholar edition) · 2017Review
- A Community-Academic Partnership to Increase Pap Testing in Appalachian Kentucky.American journal of preventive medicine · 2015Article
- Cervical cancer worry and screening among appalachian women.The journal of primary prevention · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine perceptions of cervical cancer risk in elevated-risk Appalachians.
methodsAppalachian women (n=571) completed interviews examining self-regulation model factors relevant to perceived risk of cervical cancer.
resultsWomen with good/very good knowledge of cervical cancer, greater worry, and history of sexually transmitted infection had higher odds of rating their perceived risk as somewhat/much higher than did other women. Former smokers, compared to never smokers, had lower risk perceptions.
conclusionsSelf-regulation model factors are important to understanding perceptions of cervical cancer risk in underserved women. The relationship of smoking and worry to perceived risk may be a target for intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.