ArticleJournal of proteome research2012
Addressing statistical biases in nucleotide-derived protein databases for proteogenomic search strategies.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.
- pAnno: a comprehensive, precise, and fast proteogenomic workflow for the discovery of novel coding regions.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Predominant mutated non-canonical tumor-specific antigens identified by proteogenomics demonstrate immunogenicity and tumor suppression in CRC.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Developing Well-Annotated Species-Specific Protein Databases Using Comparative Proteogenomics: An Update.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Moving Toward Metaproteogenomics: A Computational Perspective on Analyzing Microbial Samples via Proteogenomics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Proteogenomic Gene Structure Validation in the Pineapple Genome.Journal of proteome research · 2024Article
- Exploring the Alternative Proteome with OpenProt and Mass Spectrometry.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- OpenCustomDB: Integration of Unannotated Open Reading Frames and Genetic Variants to Generate More Comprehensive Customized Protein Databases.Journal of proteome research · 2023Article
- Unraveling the small proteome of the plant symbiontmicroLife · 2023Article
- Short open reading frame genes in innate immunity: from discovery to characterization.Trends in immunology · 2022Review
- An analysis of proteogenomics and how and when transcriptome-informed reduction of protein databases can enhance eukaryotic proteomics.Genome biology · 2022Article
- IntroSpect: Motif-Guided Immunopeptidome Database Building Tool to Improve the Sensitivity of HLA I Binding Peptide Identification by Mass Spectrometry.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- A Practical Guide to Small Protein Discovery and Characterization Using Mass Spectrometry.Journal of bacteriology · 2022Article
- Personalized Proteome: Comparing Proteogenomics and Open Variant Search Approaches for Single Amino Acid Variant Detection.Journal of proteome research · 2021Article
- Article
- Discovery of novel community-relevant small proteins in a simplified human intestinal microbiome.Microbiome · 2021Article
- A complete and flexible workflow for metaproteomics data analysis based on MetaProteomeAnalyzer and Prophane.Nature protocols · 2020Article
- Integrated proteogenomic deep sequencing and analytics accurately identify non-canonical peptides in tumor immunopeptidomes.Nature communications · 2020Article
- On the Impact of the Pangenome and Annotation Discrepancies While Building Protein Sequence Databases for Bacteria Proteogenomics.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- An integrative strategy to identify the entire protein coding potential of prokaryotic genomes by proteogenomics.Genome research · 2017Article
- Integrating Next-Generation Genomic Sequencing and Mass Spectrometry To Estimate Allele-Specific Protein Abundance in Human Brain.Journal of proteome research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Proteogenomics has the potential to advance genome annotation through high quality peptide identifications derived from mass spectrometry experiments, which demonstrate a given gene or isoform is expressed and translated at the protein level. This can advance our understanding of genome function, discovering novel genes and gene structure that have not yet been identified or validated. Because of the high-throughput shotgun nature of most proteomics experiments, it is essential to carefully control for false positives and prevent any potential misannotation. A number of statistical procedures to deal with this are in wide use in proteomics, calculating false discovery rate (FDR) and posterior error probability (PEP) values for groups and individual peptide spectrum matches (PSMs). These methods control for multiple testing and exploit decoy databases to estimate statistical significance. Here, we show that database choice has a major effect on these confidence estimates leading to significant differences in the number of PSMs reported. We note that standard target:decoy approaches using six-frame translations of nucleotide sequences, such as assembled transcriptome data, apparently underestimate the confidence assigned to the PSMs. The source of this error stems from the inflated and unusual nature of the six-frame database, where for every target sequence there exists five "incorrect" targets that are unlikely to code for protein. The attendant FDR and PEP estimates lead to fewer accepted PSMs at fixed thresholds, and we show that this effect is a product of the database and statistical modeling and not the search engine. A variety of approaches to limit database size and remove noncoding target sequences are examined and discussed in terms of the altered statistical estimates generated and PSMs reported. These results are of importance to groups carrying out proteogenomics, aiming to maximize the validation and discovery of gene structure in sequenced genomes, while still controlling for false positives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.