Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23024915›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2012

Impact of intraocular pressure on changes of blood flow in the retina, choroid, and optic nerve head in rats investigated by optical microangiography.

Zhongwei Zhi, William O Cepurna, Elaine C Johnson, John C Morrison, Ruikang K Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Widefield OCT angiography.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Controlled Elevation of Intraocular Pressure (CEI) Glaucoma Model in Rats.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Potential role ofNeural regeneration research · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhongwei ZhiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
William O Cepurna
Elaine C Johnson
John C Morrison
Ruikang K Wang
Oregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

STUDIES IN GLAUCOMATOUS OPTIC NERVE DAMAGER01EY010145 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MORRISON, JOHN C · 1993 to 2023
$8.9M
OPTICAL MICROANGIOGRAHY OF CEREBROVASCULAR PERFUSIONR01HL093140 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WANG, RUIKANG · 2008 to 2017
$4.2M
Label-free optical imaging of 3D structural and functional microcirculationsR01EB009682 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WANG, RUIKANG · 2009 to 2012
$1.7M
The Optic Nerve Head in GlaucomaR01EY016866 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, ELAINE C · 2005 to 2008
$1.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010145NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016866NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL093140NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we demonstrate the use of optical coherence tomography/optical microangiography (OCT/OMAG) to image and measure the effects of acute intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation on retinal, choroidal and optic nerve head (ONH) perfusion in the rat eye. In the experiments, IOP was elevated from 10 to 100 mmHg in 10 mmHg increments. At each IOP level, three-dimensional data volumes were captured using an ultrahigh sensitive (UHS) OMAG scanning protocol for 3D volumetric perfusion imaging, followed by repeated B-scans for Doppler OMAG analysis to determine blood flow velocity. Velocity and vessel diameter measurements were used to calculate blood flow in selected retinal blood vessels. Choroidal perfusion was calculated by determining the peripapillary choroidal filling at each pressure level and calculating this as a percentage of area filling at baseline (10 mmHg). ONH blood perfusion was calculated as the percentage of blood flow area over a segmented ONH area to a depth 150 microns posterior to the choroidal opening. We show that volumetric blood flow reconstructions revealed detailed 3D maps, to the capillary level, of the retinal, choroidal and ONH microvasculature, revealing retinal arterioles, capillaries and veins, the choroidal opening and a consistent presence of the central retinal artery inferior to the ONH. While OCT structural images revealed a reversible compression of the ONH and vasculature with elevated IOP, OMAG successfully documented changes in retinal, choroidal and ONH blood perfusion and allowed quantitative measurements of these changes. Starting from 30 mm Hg, retinal blood flow (RBF) diminished linearly with increasing IOP and was nearly extinguished at 100 mm Hg, with full recovery after return of IOP to baseline. Choroidal filling was unaffected until IOP reached 60 mmHg, then decreased to 20% of baseline at IOP 100 mmHg, and normalized when IOP returned to baseline. A reduction in ONH blood perfusion at higher IOP's was also observed, but shadow from overlying retinal vessels at lower IOP's limited precise measurements of changes in ONH capillary perfusion compared to baseline. Therefore, OCT/OMAG can be a useful tool to image and measure blood flow in the retina, choroidal and ONH of the rat eye as well as document the effects of elevated IOP on blood flow in these vascular beds.

Indexed as

(170.3880) Medical and biological imaging(170.4460) Ophthalmic optics and devices(170.4500) Optical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID23024915
PMCPMC3447563
OpenAlexW2123676709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.