Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23024652›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases2012

Ophthalmic parasitosis: a review article.

Amal R Nimir, Ahmed Saliem, Ibrahim Abdel Aziz Ibrahim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Ocular infestation by a juvenile leech, Myxobdella sinanensis in Japan.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A new worm infiltrating the human cornea: A report of three cases.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2018
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Update on pathology of ocular parasitic disease.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Sitting at the window to the world--ocular parasites.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amal R NimirDivision of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Cyberjaya University College of Medical Sciences, 63000 Selangor, Malaysia.
Ahmed Saliem
Ibrahim Abdel Aziz Ibrahim

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ocular parasitosis in human is more prevalent in geographical areas where environmental factors and poor sanitary conditions favor the parasitism between man and animals. Lesions in the eye can be due to damage directly caused by the infectious pathogen, indirect pathology caused by toxic products, or the immune response incited by infections or ectopic parasitism. The epidemiology of parasitic ocular diseases reflects the habitat of the causative parasites as well as the habits and health status of the patient. An ocular examination may provide clues to the underlying disease/infection, and an awareness of the possibilities of travel-related pathology may shed light on an ocular presentation. This paper is a comprehensive review of the parasitic diseases of the eye. The majority of the clinically important species of parasites involved in eye infection are reviewed in this paper. Parasites are discussed by the disease or infection they cause.

Identifiers

PMID23024652
PMCPMC3457613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.