ArticleAnnals of Indian Academy of Neurology2012
Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias: A review of recent diagnostic, therapeutic and pathophysiological developments.
Article in Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nose- and Sinus-related Neuralgia Syndromes: a Narrative Review with Proposed Diagnostic and Management Algorithm.Maedica · 2026Review
- The sensitivity to change of the cluster headache quality of life scale assessed before and after deep brain stimulation of the ventral tegmental area.The journal of headache and pain · 2021Article
- Is pituitary MRI screening necessary in cluster headache?Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2021Article
- Headache for ophthalmologists: current advances in headache understanding and management.Eye (London, England) · 2021Review
- New insights in post-traumatic headache with cluster headache phenotype: a cohort study.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2020Article
- Images depicting headache pain - a tool to aid the diagnosis of cluster headache: a pilot study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2019Article
- Novel Interventional Nonopioid Therapies in Headache Management.Current pain and headache reports · 2018Review
- Advanced technologies and novel neurostimulation targets in trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2015Article
- Symptomatic cluster headache: a review of 63 cases.SpringerPlus · 2014Review
- A guide to identify cervical autonomic dysfunctions (and associated conditions) in patients with musculoskeletal disorders in physical therapy practice.Brazilian journal of physical therapyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs) are a group of primary headache disorders that are characterized by strictly unilateral trigeminal distribution pain occurring in association with ipsilateral cranial autonomic symptoms. This group includes cluster headache, paroxysmal hemicrania and short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing. These disorders are very painful, often considered to be some of the most painful conditions known to mankind, and consequently are highly disabling. They are distinguished by the frequency of attacks of pain, the length of the attacks and very characteristic responses to medical therapy, such that the diagnosis can usually be made clinically, which is important because it dictates therapy. The management of TACs can be very rewarding for physicians and highly beneficial to patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.