Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23024060›Full record

ReviewReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2013

Purification of oogonial stem cells from adult mouse and human ovaries: an assessment of the literature and a view toward the future.

Dori C Woods, Yvonne A R White, Jonathan L Tilly

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Perspective in infertility: the ovarian stem cells.Journal of ovarian research · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dori C WoodsVincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Yvonne A R White
Jonathan L Tilly
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Origins/Functions of Mammalian Female Germline Stem CellR37AG012279 · NIA · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI TILLY, JONATHAN LEE · 2006 to 2015
$3.3M
Stem cell derived ovarian somatic cells in ovarian replacement therapyF32AG034809 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WOODS, DORI COUSINS · 2009 to 2011
$157k
NIA NIH HHS F32 AG034809NIA NIH HHS F32-AG034809NIA NIH HHS R37 AG012279NIA NIH HHS R37-AG012279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contemporary claims that mitotically active female germ line or oogonial stem cells (OSCs) exist and support oogenesis during postnatal life in mammals have been debated in the field of reproductive biology since March 2004, when a mouse study posed the first serious challenge to the dogma of a fixed pool of oocytes being endowed at birth in more than 50 years. Other studies have since been put forth that further question the validity of this dogma, including the isolation of OSCs from neonatal and adult mouse ovaries by 4 independent groups using multiple strategies. Two of these groups also reported that isolated mouse OSCs, once transplanted back into ovaries of adult female mice, differentiate into fully functional eggs that ovulate, fertilize, and produce healthy embryos and offspring. Arguably, one of the most significant advances in this emerging field was provided by a new research study published this year, which reported the successful isolation and functional characterization of OSCs from ovaries of reproductive age women. Two commentaries on this latest work, one cautiously supportive and one highly skeptical, were published soon afterward. This article evaluates the current literature regarding postnatal oogenesis in mammals and discusses important next steps for future work on OSC biology and function.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell SeparationFemaleFlow CytometryForecastingHumansMiceOogoniaOvaryStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID23024060
PMCPMC3676240
OpenAlexW2111821999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.