Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23023663›Full record

ArticleBriefings in functional genomics2012

Interpreting the regulatory genome: the genomics of transcription factor function in Drosophila melanogaster.

Matthew Slattery, Nicolas Nègre, Kevin P White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in functional genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew SlatteryInstitute for Genomics & Systems Biology, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Nicolas Nègre
Kevin P White

Funding

CORE: ADMINISTRATIVEP50GM081892 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI WHITE, KEVIN P. · 2008 to 2013
$15.9M
A Cis Regulatory map of the Drosophila GenomeU01HG004264 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI WHITE, KEVIN P. · 2007 to 2011
$12.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01HG004264NIGMS NIH HHS P50GM081892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers have now had access to the fully sequenced Drosophila melanogaster genome for over a decade, and the sequenced genomes of 11 additional Drosophila species have been available for almost 5 years, with more species' genomes becoming available every year [Adams MD, Celniker SE, Holt RA, et al. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 2000;287:2185-95; Clark AG, Eisen MB, Smith DR, et al. Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny. Nature 2007;450:203-18]. Although the best studied of the D. melanogaster transcription factors (TFs) were cloned before sequencing of the genome, the availability of sequence data promised to transform our understanding of TFs and gene regulatory networks. Sequenced genomes have allowed researchers to generate tools for high-throughput characterization of gene expression levels, genome-wide TF localization and analyses of evolutionary constraints on DNA elements across multiple species. With an estimated 700 DNA-binding proteins in the Drosophila genome, it will be many years before each potential sequence-specific TF is studied in detail, yet the last decade of functional genomics research has already impacted our view of gene regulatory networks and TF DNA recognition.

Indexed as

Genome, InsectAnimalsDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterEvolution, MolecularGene Regulatory NetworksTranscription FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23023663
PMCPMC3459015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.