ArticleMolecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.)2012
In silico discovery of androgen receptor antagonists with activity in castration resistant prostate cancer.
Article in Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Should oxidosqualene cyclase in the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway be considered an anti-cancer target?Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Targeting castration-resistant prostate cancer with androgen receptor antisense oligonucleotide therapy.JCI insight · 2019Article
- Endocrine Disruption at the Androgen Receptor: Employing Molecular Dynamics and Docking for Improved Virtual Screening and Toxicity Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- Participation of androgen and its receptor in sex determination of an amphibian species.PloS one · 2017Article
- Cholesterol biosynthesis inhibitor RO 48-8071 suppresses growth of hormone-dependent and castration-resistant prostate cancer cells.OncoTargets and therapy · 2016Article
- Progress in antiandrogen design targeting hormone binding pocket to circumvent mutation based resistance.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2015Review
- Androgen receptor: structure, role in prostate cancer and drug discovery.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2015Review
- Review
- Prostate cancer and bone: the elective affinities.BioMed research international · 2014Review
- Selectively targeting prostate cancer with antiandrogen equipped histone deacetylase inhibitors.ACS chemical biology · 2013Article
- Targeting alternative sites on the androgen receptor to treat castration-resistant prostate cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2013Review
- Evolving landscape and novel treatments in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.Asian journal of andrology · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Previously available androgen receptor (AR) antagonists (bicalutamide, flutamide, and nilutamide) have limited activity against AR in prostate cancers that relapse after castration [castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)]. However, recent AR competitive antagonists such as MDV3100, generated through chemical modifications to the current AR ligands, appear to have increased activity in CRPC and have novel mechanisms of action. Using pharmacophore models and a refined homology model of the antagonist-liganded AR ligand binding domain, we carried out in silico screens of small molecule libraries and report here on the identification of a series of structurally distinct nonsteroidal small molecule competitive AR antagonists. Despite their unique chemical architectures, compounds representing each of six chemotypes functioned in vitro as pure AR antagonists. Moreover, similarly to MDV3100 and in contrast to previous AR antagonists, these compounds all prevented AR binding to chromatin, consistent with each of the six chemotypes stabilizing a similar AR antagonist conformation. Additional studies with the lead chemotype (chemotype A) showed enhanced AR protein degradation, which was dependent on helix 12 in the AR ligand binding domain. Significantly, chemotype A compounds functioned as AR antagonists in vivo in normal male mice and suppressed AR activity and tumor cell proliferation in human CRPC xenografts. These data indicate that certain ligand-induced structural alterations in the AR ligand binding domain may both impair AR chromatin binding and enhance AR degradation and support continued efforts to develop AR antagonists with unique mechanisms of action and efficacy in CRPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.