Trial reportGastroenterology2013
Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy-results of the complete adenoma resection (CARE) study.
Trial report in Gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 9 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 281 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Complete Histologic Resection of Adenomatous Polyps? (Complete Adenoma REsection Trial - CARE Trial)
Piecemeal Versus En Bloc Resection of Large Rectal Adenomas -A Prospective, Randomized Multicenter Study
A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Jumbo Cold Biopsy Forceps Versus Cold Snare for the Resection of Small Colonic Polyps
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Diminutive and Small Colorectal Polyps: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Underwater Resection of Non-pedunculated Colorectal Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial
National Colorectal Polyp Care for Diagnosis, Classification and Resection
Polypectomy With Hot vs Cold Snare in Small Colonic Lesions
Effect of Epinephrine on Immediate Post-polypectomy Pain in Colorectal Lesions Larger Than 20 mm
Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effect of External Evaluation and Training on the Incomplete Resection Rate in Cold Snare Polypectomies in Colonic Lesions <10 Mm (POLIPEVA Study)
Who cites it
281 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 743 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for the treatment of rectal tumors extending to the dentate line: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Pooled it
- Risk factors for incomplete excision of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Thermal ablation of margins for recurrence prevention after endoscopic mucosal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Pooled it
- Advancements in Image-Based Analyses for Morphology and Staging of Colon Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.BioMed research international · 2025Pooled it
- Quality indicators for colonoscopy.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Guideline
- Pooled it
- Different endoscopic treatments for small colorectal polyps: A systematic review, pair-wise, and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Recurrence rates after endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Pooled it
- Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2020Guideline
- Guideline
- The contribution of endoscopy quality measures to the development of interval colorectal cancers in the screening population: a systematic review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2019Pooled it
- Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2017Guideline
- British Society of Gastroenterology position statement on serrated polyps in the colon and rectum.Gut · 2017Guideline
- Effect of an E-learning resource on endoscopists' proximal serrated polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial.Endoscopy · 2024Trial
- Cold snare polypectomy versus cold endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Trial
- Endoscopic mucosal resection-precuttingWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2022Trial
- Randomized controlled trial investigating use of submucosal injection of EverLift™ in rates of complete resection of non-pedunculated 4-9 mm polyps.International journal of colorectal disease · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Usefulness of narrow-band imaging for the detection of remnant sessile-serrated adenoma (SSA) tissue after endoscopic resection: the KASID multicenter study.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Trial
- Hot snare polypectomy versus endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Trial
221 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2021
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsAlthough the adenoma detection rate is used as a measure of colonoscopy quality, there are limited data on the quality of endoscopic resection of detected adenomas. We determined the rate of incompletely resected neoplastic polyps in clinical practice.
methodsWe performed a prospective study on 1427 patients who underwent colonoscopy at 2 medical centers and had at least 1 nonpedunculated polyp (5-20 mm). After polyp removal was considered complete macroscopically, biopsies were obtained from the resection margin. The main outcome was the percentage of incompletely resected neoplastic polyps (incomplete resection rate [IRR]) determined by the presence of neoplastic tissue in post-polypectomy biopsies. Associations between IRR and polyp size, morphology, histology, and endoscopist were assessed by regression analysis.
resultsOf 346 neoplastic polyps (269 patients; 84.0% men; mean age, 63.4 years) removed by 11 gastroenterologists, 10.1% were incompletely resected. IRR increased with polyp size and was significantly higher for large (10-20 mm) than small (5-9 mm) neoplastic polyps (17.3% vs 6.8%; relative risk = 2.1), and for sessile serrated adenomas/polyps than for conventional adenomas (31.0% vs 7.2%; relative risk = 3.7). The IRR for endoscopists with at least 20 polypectomies ranged from 6.5% to 22.7%; there was a 3.4-fold difference between the highest and lowest IRR after adjusting for size and sessile serrated histology.
conclusionsNeoplastic polyps are often incompletely resected, and the rate of incomplete resection varies broadly among endoscopists. Incomplete resection might contribute to the development of colon cancers after colonoscopy (interval cancers). Efforts are needed to ensure complete resection, especially of larger lesions. ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT01224444.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.