Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23022405›Full record

ArticleExperimental eye research2012

Biopsy harvesting site and distance from the explant affect conjunctival epithelial phenotype ex vivo.

I G Fostad, J R Eidet, M A Shatos, T P Utheim, O A Utheim, S Raeder, D A Dartt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental eye research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. [New approaches to ocular surface reconstruction beyond the cornea].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2017
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

I G FostadSchepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, 20 Staniford Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
J R Eidet
M A Shatos
T P Utheim
O A Utheim
S Raeder
D A Dartt
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USSmith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute · USHarvard University · USOslo University Hospital · NOStavanger University Hospital · NO

Funding

Conjunctival Goblet Cell Mucin Secretion in Inflammation and Its ResolutionR01EY019470 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI DARTT, DARLENE A · 2009 to 2023
$7.4M
CONTROL OF CONJUNCTIVAL GOBLET CELL MUCOUS PRODUCTIONR01EY009057 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI DARTT, DARLENE A · 1991 to 2009
$3.2M
NEI NIH HHS EY009057NEI NIH HHS EY019470NEI NIH HHS R01 EY009057NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate if the number of goblet cells expanded ex vivo from a conjunctival explant is affected by the biopsy harvesting site on the conjunctiva and the distance from the explant. Conjunctival explants from six regions: superior and inferior bulbus, fornix, and tarsus of male Sprague-Dawley rats were grown in RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal bovine serum on coverslips for eight days. Histochemical and immunofluorescent staining of goblet (CK-7/UEA-1/MUC5AC), stratified squamous, non-goblet (CK-4), proliferating (PCNA) and progenitor (ABCG2) cells were analyzed by epifluorescence and laser confocal microscopy. Outgrowth was measured with NIH ImageJ. For statistical analysis the Mann-Whitney test and Spearman's rank-order correlation test were used. Cultures from superior and inferior fornix contained the most goblet cells as indicated by the presence of CK-7+, UEA-1+ and MUC5AC+ cells. Superior and inferior forniceal cultures displayed 60.8% ± 9.2% and 64.7% ± 6.7% CK-7+ cells, respectively, compared to the superior tarsal (26.6% ± 8.4%; P < 0.05), superior bulbar (31.0% ± 4.0%; P < 0.05), inferior bulbar (38.5% ± 9.3%; P < 0.05) and inferior tarsal cultures (27.7% ± 8.3%; P < 0.05). While 28.4% ± 6.3% of CK-7+ goblet cells co-labeled with PCNA, only 7.4% ± 1.6% of UEA-1+ goblet cells did (P < 0.01). CK-7+ goblet cells were located at a lower concentration close to the explant (39.8% ± 3.1%) compared to near the leading edge (58.2% ± 4.5%; P < 0.05). Both markers for goblet cell secretory product (UEA-1 and MUC5AC), however, displayed the opposite pattern with a higher percentage of positive cells close to the explant than near the leading edge (P < 0.05). The percentage of CK-4+ cells was higher near the explant compared to near the leading edge (P < 0.01). The percentage of CK-7+ goblet cells in the cultures did not correlate with the outgrowth size (r(s) = -0.086; P = 0.435). The percentage of UEA-1+ goblet cells correlated negatively with outgrowth size (r(s) = -0.347; P < 0.01), whereas the percentage of CK-4+ cells correlated positively with the outgrowth size (r(s) = 0.473; P < 0.05). We conclude that forniceal explants yield the highest number of goblet cells ex vivo and thereby seem to be optimal for goblet cell transplantation. We also suggest that CK-7+/UEA-1- cells represent highly proliferative immature goblet cells. These cells could be important during conjunctival migration as they are mostly located close to the leading edge and their density does not decrease with increasing outgrowth size.

Indexed as

AnimalsATP-Binding Cassette TransportersATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2BiomarkersBiopsyCell CountCell ProliferationCells, CulturedConjunctivaGoblet CellsKeratinsMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalMucin 5ACPhenotypePlant LectinsAbcg2 protein, ratATP-Binding Cassette TransportersATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2BiomarkersKeratinsMuc5ac protein, ratMucin 5ACPlant LectinsProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenUlex europaeus lectins

Identifiers

PMID23022405
PMCPMC4216974
OpenAlexW2065849968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.