Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23022316›Full record

ArticleLung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2012

Patterns and predictors of first-line chemotherapy use among adults with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the cancer research network.

Debra P Ritzwoller, Nikki M Carroll, Thomas Delate, Mark C Hornbrook, Lawrence Kushi, Erin J Aiello Bowles, Jared M Freml, Karl Huang, Elizabeth T Loggers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Predicting neutropenia risk in patients with cancer using electronic data.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Debra P RitzwollerInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, 10065 E. Harvard Avenue, Suite 300, Denver, CO 80231, USA. debra.ritzwoller@kp.org
Nikki M Carroll
Thomas Delate
Mark C Hornbrook
Lawrence Kushi
Erin J Aiello Bowles
Jared M Freml
Karl Huang
Elizabeth T Loggers

Funding

The HMO Cancer Research Network (CRN)U19CA079689 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI WAGNER, EDWARD H · 1999 to 2011
$62.6M
CRN4: Cancer Research Resources & Collaboration in Integrated Health Care SystemsU24CA171524 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KUSHI, LAWRENCE H · 2012 to 2016
$16.0M
Medical Care Burden of Cancer: System and Data IssuesR01CA114204 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HORNBROOK, MARK CHRISTOPHER · 2007 to 2010
$2.7M
Building CER Capacity: Aligning CRN, CMS, and State Resources to Map Cancer CareRC2CA148185 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI RITZWOLLER, DEBRA P, WEEKS, JANE C. · 2009 to 2009
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA114204NCI NIH HHS RC2 CA148185NCI NIH HHS U19 CA079689NCI NIH HHS U19 CA79689NCI NIH HHS U24 CA171524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRelatively low rates of chemotherapy receipt have been observed in older patients diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in SEER-Medicare-based studies. However, little is known about variation in first-line NSCLC chemotherapy use in younger patients, health maintenance organization (HMO)-based settings, and for high-cost, novel agents, such as bevacizumab and erlotinib.

methodsA cohort of 6614 stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients aged ≥ 21 years diagnosed between 2000 and 2007 was identified at four HMOs that participate in the Cancer Research Network (CRN). Demographic, comorbidity, tumor characteristics, and chemotherapy treatment data were included in logistic regression models to identify factors associated with chemotherapy receipt and tests of association examined secular and age-specific variation in first-line chemotherapy regimens.

resultsWithin 120 days of diagnosis, 3612 (55%) patients received chemotherapy; increasing from 52% of patients diagnosed in 2000 to 59% in 2007 (p<0.001). Receipt was significantly higher for patients aged <65 years (64% versus 46% in ≥ 65) and was inversely related to stage and comorbidites (all p<0.001). Carboplatin and paclitaxel were received most frequently. Erlotinib and bevacizumab use in the later years of the study was associated with a significant change in distributions of first-line chemotherapies (p<0.001).

conclusionsFor patients alive 30 days post diagnosis, chemotherapy use was higher in the aged population (>65 years) than previously published estimates, and higher still among younger patients. Chemotherapy use increased over the observation period, and the mix of first-line therapies used changed substantially over time. Of note, novel, high cost treatments were used in first-line therapy prior to FDA approval, increasing significantly throughout the study period. These findings demonstrate the utility of HMO CRN data to augment SEER-Medicare to conduct comparative effectiveness research related to chemotherapy use and the use of specific agents, especially among younger patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansInduction ChemotherapyLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23022316
PMCPMC3490021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.