Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23021872›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2012

Micro-crystallography comes of age.

Janet L Smith, Robert F Fischetti, Masaki Yamamoto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Macromolecular crystallography at SPring-8 and SACLA.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. xia2.multiplex: a multi-crystal data-analysis pipeline.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Versatile microporous polymer-based supports for serial macromolecular crystallography.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Depth-of-field extension in optical imaging for rapid crystal screening.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Journal of applied crystallography · 2020
    Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Janet L SmithLife Sciences Institute and Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. JanetSmith@umich.edu
Robert F Fischetti
Masaki Yamamoto

Funding

NCI NIH HHS Y01 CO001020NCI NIH HHS Y1-CO-1020NIGMS NIH HHS Y01 GM001104NIGMS NIH HHS Y1-GM-1104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The latest revolution in macromolecular crystallography was incited by the development of dedicated, user friendly, micro-crystallography beam lines. Brilliant X-ray beams of diameter 20 μm or less, now available at most synchrotron sources, enable structure determination from samples that previously were inaccessible. Relative to traditional crystallography, crystals with one or more small dimensions have diffraction patterns with vastly improved signal-to-noise when recorded with an appropriately matched beam size. Structures can be solved from isolated, well diffracting regions within inhomogeneous samples. This review summarizes the technological requirements and approaches to producing micro-beams and how they continue to change the practice of crystallography.

Indexed as

CrystallographyLasersMicrotechnologyProtein StabilityX-Rays

Identifiers

PMID23021872
PMCPMC3478446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.