Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23021534›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry2013

Young adults at risk for stimulant dependence show reward dysfunction during reinforcement-based decision making.

Jennifer L Stewart, Taru M Flagan, April C May, Martina Reske, Alan N Simmons, Martin P Paulus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Blunted Frontostriatal Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent Signals Predict Stimulant and Marijuana Use.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2018
    Article
  6. Chronotype and Mental Health: Recent Advances.Current psychiatry reports · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Altered neural processing of the need to stop in young adults at risk for stimulant dependence.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer L StewartDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. j6stewart@ucsd.edu
Taru M Flagan
April C May
Martina Reske
Alan N Simmons
Martin P Paulus
University of California, San Diego · USVA San Diego Healthcare System · US

Funding

Neuroimaging CoreP20DA027843 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SCHULTEIS, GERHARD G · 2010 to 2013
$3.5M
NEUROBIOLOGY OF TRANSITION TO STIMULANT DEPENDENCER01DA016663 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PAULUS, MARTIN P. · 2004 to 2010
$2.8M
Negative reinforcement and interoceptive dysfunction in stimulant dependence.R01DA027797 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PAULUS, MARTIN P. · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
STIMULANT DEPENDENCE: NEURAL MECHANISMS OF RELAPSER01DA018307 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PAULUS, MARTIN P. · 2004 to 2008
$1.3M
NIDA NIH HHS P20-DA027834NIDA NIH HHS P20 DA027843NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016663NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA016663NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA018307NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA018307NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA027797NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA027797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile stimulant-dependent individuals continue to make risky decisions, in spite of poor outcomes, much less is known about decision-making characteristics of occasional stimulant users (OSU) at risk for developing stimulant dependence. This study examines whether OSU exhibit inefficient learning and execution of reinforced decision-outcome contingencies.

methodsOccasional stimulant users (n = 161) and stimulant-naïve comparison subjects (CTL) (n = 48) performed a Paper Scissors Rock task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Selecting a particular option was associated with a predetermined probability of winning, which was altered repeatedly to examine neural and behavioral characteristics of reinforced contingencies.

resultsOccasional stimulant users displayed greater anterior insula, inferior frontal gyrus, and dorsal striatum activation than CTL during late trials when contingencies were familiar (as opposed to being learned) in the presence of comparable behavioral performance in both groups. Follow-up analyses demonstrated that during late trials: 1) OSU with high cannabis use displayed greater activation in these brain regions than CTL, whereas OSU with low cannabis use did not differ from the other two groups; and 2) OSU preferring cocaine exhibited greater anterior insula, inferior frontal gyrus, and dorsal striatum activation than CTL and also displayed higher activation in the former two regions than OSU who preferred prescription stimulants.

conclusionsOccasional stimulant users exhibit inefficient resource allocation during the execution of reinforced contingencies that may be a result of additive effects of cocaine and cannabis use. A critical next step is to establish whether this inefficiency predicts transition to stimulant dependence.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyBrainBrain MappingDecision MakingFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRisk FactorsSubstance-Related DisordersYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23021534
PMCPMC3674030
OpenAlexW2089163599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.