Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23021040›Full record

ReviewMetabolism: clinical and experimental2013

Personalized medicine in major depressive disorder -- opportunities and pitfalls.

Diane B Miller, James P O'Callaghan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Metabolism: clinical and experimental, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Prophylactic ketamine alters nucleotide and neurotransmitter metabolism in brain and plasma following stress.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Agomelatine: an agent against anhedonia and abulia?Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2015
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Biomarkers in pediatric depression.Depression and anxiety · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Diane B MillerCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA. dum6@cdc.gov
James P O'Callaghan
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sequencing of the human genome in the early days of this millennium was greeted with great fanfare as this accomplishment was expected to revolutionize medicine and result in individualized treatments based on the genetic make-up of the patient. The ultimate promise of personalized medicine would be fulfilled with the identification of disease biomarkers that would be widely available for use in diagnosis and treatment. Progress, however, has been slow in providing disease biomarkers or approved diagnostic tests. This is true for major depressive disorder (MDD), despite its prevalence in the general population and the widespread acceptance of its biological basis. Studies using strategies like genome-wide association and candidate gene analyses have identified a number of possible biomarkers of MDD, including serum levels of neurotrophic factors, inflammatory cytokines and HPA axis hormones, but none have proven sufficiently powerful for clinical use. The lack of biologically based tests available for use in identifying patients with MDD is a significant impediment to personalized and more effective treatment, because it means diagnosis continues to be driven by subjective symptoms. While genetic studies of MDD have not yet led to diagnostic and treatment biomarkers, progress in determining the role of the genome in drug metabolism heralds the first effort in personalized prescribing for the antidepressants. The FDA suggested and approved genotyping tests for common variants of drug metabolism genes, such as the cytochrome p450s. By using these tests a physician can select an appropriate antidepressant for a given patient, as differences in clearance, half-life, and peak blood concentrations are controlled by genetic variability in drug metabolism. Personalization in drug choice can be achieved because these tests: (1) identify responders and non-responders; (2) provide alerts to possible adverse drug events; and (3) help optimize dose. Improved ways of diagnosing and prescribing effective treatments for MDD are needed, as the available methods are inadequate and symptom based. In the foreseeable future, further interrogation of the genome may serve as the basis for development of new personalized medicine strategies for diagnosis and treatment of MDD.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsGenetic MarkersMolecular Targeted TherapyPrecision MedicineBiomarkersCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemCytokinesGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHumansHypothalamo-Hypophyseal SystemMajor Depressive DisorderNerve Growth FactorsNeurotransmitter AgentsPharmacogeneticsPrimary Health CareAntidepressive AgentsBiomarkersCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemCytokinesGenetic MarkersNerve Growth FactorsNeurotransmitter Agents

Identifiers

PMID23021040
PMCPMC4672728
OpenAlexW1988907866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.