Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23020625›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2012

A duck RH panel and its potential for assisting NGS genome assembly.

Man Rao, Mireille Morisson, Thomas Faraut, Suzanne Bardes, Katia Fève, Emmanuelle Labarthe, Valérie Fillon, Yinhua Huang, Ning Li, Alain Vignal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Time lapse: A glimpse into prehistoric genomics.European journal of medical genetics · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Characterization of Duck (Frontiers in genetics · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mapping and genotypic analysis of the NK-lysin gene in chicken.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2014
    Article
  18. Novel tools for characterising inter and intra chromosomal rearrangements in avian microchromosomes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2014
    Article
  19. All chromosomes great and small: 10 years on.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Man RaoUMR INRA/ENVT Laboratoire de Génétique Cellulaire, INRA, Castanet-Tolosan 31326, France.
Mireille Morisson
Thomas Faraut
Suzanne Bardes
Katia Fève
Emmanuelle Labarthe
Valérie Fillon
Yinhua Huang
Ning Li
Alain Vignal

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOwing to the low cost of the high throughput Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technology, more and more species have been and will be sequenced. However, de novo assemblies of large eukaryotic genomes thus produced are composed of a large number of contigs and scaffolds of medium to small size, having no chromosomal assignment. Radiation hybrid (RH) mapping is a powerful tool for building whole genome maps and has been used for several animal species, to help assign sequence scaffolds to chromosomes and determining their order.

resultsWe report here a duck whole genome RH panel obtained by fusing female duck embryonic fibroblasts irradiated at a dose of 6,000 rads, with HPRT-deficient Wg3hCl2 hamster cells. The ninety best hybrids, having an average retention of 23.6% of the duck genome, were selected for the final panel. To allow the genotyping of large numbers of markers, as required for whole genome mapping, without having to cultivate the hybrid clones on a large scale, three different methods involving Whole Genome Amplification (WGA) and/or scaling down PCR volumes by using the Fluidigm BioMark(TM) Integrated Fluidic Circuits (IFC) Dynamic Array(TM) for genotyping were tested. RH maps of APL12 and APL22 were built, allowing the detection of intrachromosomal rearrangements when compared to chicken. Finally, the panel proved useful for checking the assembly of sequence scaffolds and for mapping EST located on one of the smallest microchromosomes.

conclusionThe Fluidigm BioMark(TM) Integrated Fluidic Circuits (IFC) Dynamic Array(TM) genotyping by quantitative PCR provides a rapid and cost-effective method for building RH linkage groups. Although the vast majority of genotyped markers exhibited a picture coherent with their associated scaffolds, a few of them were discordant, pinpointing potential assembly errors. Comparative mapping with chicken chromosomes GGA21 and GGA11 allowed the detection of the first chromosome rearrangements on microchromosomes between duck and chicken. As in chicken, the smallest duck microchromosomes appear missing in the assembly and more EST data will be needed for mapping them. Altogether, this underlines the added value of RH mapping to improve genome assemblies.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineChickensCricetinaeDucksFemaleFibroblastsGenetic MarkersGenotyping TechniquesRadiation Hybrid MappingSequence Analysis, DNAGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID23020625
PMCPMC3496577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.