Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23019530›Full record

ArticleSafety and health at work2012

A model for design of tailored working environment intervention programmes for small enterprises.

Peter Hasle, Laura V Kvorning, Charlotte Dn Rasmussen, Louise H Smith, Mari-Ann Flyvholm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Safety and health at work, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Management Approaches to Health and Safety at Work during Prevention Intervention Planning.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Intermediary Perspectives on Total Worker Health in Small Businesses.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. NOSACQ-50 for Safety Climate Assessment in Agricultural Activities: A Case Study in Central Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peter HasleNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Laura V Kvorning
Charlotte Dn Rasmussen
Louise H Smith
Mari-Ann Flyvholm

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSmall enterprises have higher exposure to occupational hazards compared to larger enterprises and further, they have fewer resources to control the risks. In order to improve the working environment, development of efficient measures is therefore a major challenge for regulators and other stakeholders. The aim of this paper is to develop a systematic model for the design of tailored intervention programmes meeting the needs of small enterprises.

methodsAn important challenge for the design process is the transfer of knowledge from one context to another. The concept of realist analysis can provide insight into mechanisms by which intervention knowledge can be transferred from one context to another. We use this theoretical approach to develop a design model.

resultsTHE MODEL CONSIST OF FIVE STEPS: 1) Defining occupational health and safety challenges of the target group, 2) selecting methods to improve the working environment, 3) developing theories about mechanisms which motivate the target group, 4) analysing the specific context of the target group for small enterprise programmes including owner-management role, social relations, and the perception of the working environment, and 5) designing the intervention based on the preceding steps. We demonstrate how the design model can be applied in practice by the development of an intervention programme for small enterprises in the construction industry.

conclusionThe model provides a useful tool for a systematic design process. The model makes it transparent for both researchers and practitioners as to how existing knowledge can be used in the design of new intervention programmes.

Indexed as

Construction industryInterventionProgramme theoryRealist analysisSmall enterprises

Identifiers

PMID23019530
PMCPMC3443693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.