Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23019120›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2012

Distinct effects of attention on the neural responses to form and motion processing: a SSVEP source-imaging study.

Melanie Palomares, Justin M Ales, Alex R Wade, Benoit R Cottereau, Anthony M Norcia

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The time course of feature-selective attention inside and outside the focus of spatial attention.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Melanie PalomaresUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA. paloma@sc.edu
Justin M Ales
Alex R Wade
Benoit R Cottereau
Anthony M Norcia

Funding

NORMAL AND ABNORMAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT IN INFANTSR01EY006579 · NEI · SMITH-KETTLEWELL EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI NORCIA, ANTHONY M · 1986 to 2008
$3.9M
TRAINING IN VISION RESEARCHT32EY014536 · NEI · SMITH-KETTLEWELL EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI NORCIA, ANTHONY M · 2002 to 2006
$1.0M
The Development of Visual Integration & Attention: A High-Density EEG StudyF32EY019223 · NEI · SMITH-KETTLEWELL EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI PALOMARES, MELANIE C · 2008 to 2008
$50k
BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGICALF32EY006579 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA · PI DUFFOURC, MICHELLE M · 1995 to 1997
–
NEI NIH HHS EY014536NEI NIH HHS EY06579NEI NIH HHS EY19223NEI NIH HHS F32 EY006579NEI NIH HHS F32 EY019223NEI NIH HHS R01 EY006579NEI NIH HHS T32 EY014536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We measured neural responses to local and global aspects of form and motion stimuli using frequency-tagged, steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. Random dot stimuli were used to portray either dynamic Glass patterns (Glass, 1969) or coherent motion displays. SSVEPs were used to estimate neural activity in a set of fMRI-defined visual areas in each subject. To compare activity associated with local versus global processing, we analyzed two frequency components of the SSVEP in each visual area: the high temporal frequency at which the local dots were updated (30 Hz) and the much lower frequency corresponding to updates in the global structure (0.83 Hz). Local and global responses were evaluated in the context of two different behavioral tasks--subjects had to either direct their attention toward or away from the global coherence of the stimuli. The data show that the effect of attention on global and local responses is both stimulus and visual area dependent. When attention was directed away from stimulus coherence, both local and global responses were higher in the coherent motion than Glass pattern condition. Directing attention to coherence in Glass patterns enhanced global activity in areas LOC, hMT+, V4, V3a, and V1, while attention to global motion modulated responses by a smaller amount in a smaller set of areas: V4, hMT+, and LOC. In contrast, directing attention towards stimulus coherence weakly increased local responses to both coherent motion and Glass patterns. These results suggest that visual attention differentially modulates the activity of early visual areas at both local and global levels of structural encoding.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAttentionBrain MappingEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleForm PerceptionHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMotion PerceptionPhotic StimulationVisual CortexVisual PathwaysYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23019120
PMCPMC4504152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.