Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23019105›Full record

ArticleElectrophoresis2012

Electrophoretic separations in poly(dimethylsiloxane) microchips using mixtures of ionic, nonionic and zwitterionic surfactants.

Qian Guan, Scott D Noblitt, Charles S Henry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Electrophoresis, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qian GuanDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Scott D Noblitt
Charles S Henry

Funding

Rapid, Inexpensive Microchip Assay for HomocysteineR44HL083579 · NHLBI · ADVANCED MICROLABS, LLC · PI WILLARD, DALE M · 2008 to 2009
$750k
Rapid Metabolomic Screening by Microchip CD-ECDR01EB004876 · NIBIB · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HENRY, CHARLES S · 2006 to 2008
$586k
NHLBI NIH HHS 2R44HL083579-02A1NHLBI NIH HHS R44 HL083579NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB004876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of surfactant mixtures to affect both EOF and separation selectivity in electrophoresis with PDMS substrates is reported, and capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection is introduced for EOF measurement on PDMS microchips. First, the EOF was measured for two nonionic surfactants (Tween 20 and Triton X-100), mixed ionic/nonionic surfactant systems (SDS/Tween 20 and SDS/Triton X-100), and finally for the first time, mixed zwitterionic/nonionic surfactant systems (TDAPS/Tween 20 and TDAPS/Triton X-100). EOF for the nonionic surfactants decreased with increasing surfactant concentration. The addition of SDS or TDAPS to a nonionic surfactant increased EOF. After establishing the EOF behavior, the separation of model catecholamines was explored to show the impact on separations. Similar analyte resolution with greater peak heights was achieved with mixed surfactant systems containing Tween 20 and TDAPS relative to the single surfactant system. Finally, the detection of catecholamine release from PC12 cells by stimulation with 80 mM K(+) was performed to demonstrate the usefulness of mixed surfactant systems to provide resolution of biological compounds in complex samples.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnionsCatecholaminesDimethylpolysiloxanesElectroosmosisElectrophoresis, MicrochipOctoxynolPC12 CellsPolysorbatesRatsReproducibility of ResultsSodium Dodecyl SulfateSurface-Active AgentsAnionsbaysilonCatecholaminesDimethylpolysiloxanesOctoxynolPolysorbatesSodium Dodecyl SulfateSurface-Active Agents

Identifiers

PMID23019105
PMCPMC3804416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.