Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23018800›Full record

ReviewJournal of cellular physiology2013

The pur protein family: genetic and structural features in development and disease.

Edward M Johnson, Dianne C Daniel, Jennifer Gordon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cellular physiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Marine life science & technology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edward M JohnsonDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA 23507-1696, USA. johnsoEM@evms.edu
Dianne C Daniel
Jennifer Gordon

Funding

TAT induced deregulation of neuronal differentiation and survival by NGFP01NS043980 · NINDS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI AMINI, SHOHREH · 2002 to 2012
$11.5M
VIRAL MODEL FOR TUMOR PATHOGENESIS IN BRAINP01NS036466 · NINDS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI KHALILI, KAMEL · 1996 to 2007
$6.6M
NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS036466NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS043980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Pur proteins are an ancient family of sequence-specific single-stranded nucleic acid-binding proteins. They bind a G-rich element in either single- or double-stranded nucleic acids and are capable of displacing the complementary C-rich strand. Recently several reports have described Pur family member knockouts, mutations, and disease aberrations. Together with a recent crystal structure of Purα, these data reveal conserved structural features of these proteins that have been adapted to serve functions unique to higher eukaryotes. In humans Pur proteins are critical for myeloid cell development, muscle development, and brain development, including trafficking of mRNA to neuronal dendrites. Pur family members have been implicated in diseases as diverse as cancer, premature aging, and fragile-X mental retardation syndrome.

Indexed as

DNA-Binding ProteinsFragile X SyndromeMuscle DevelopmentNeoplasmsTranscription FactorsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsGene Knockout TechniquesHumansMiceMolecular Sequence Datac-MYC-associated zinc finger proteinDNA-Binding ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23018800
PMCPMC3747735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.