Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23018467›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2012

Prediction of morphine clearance in the paediatric population : how accurate are the available pharmacokinetic models?

Elke H J Krekels, Dick Tibboel, Meindert Danhof, Catherijne A J Knibbe

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Update of the Scientific Opinion on opium alkaloids in poppy seeds.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2018
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elke H J KrekelsDivision of Pharmacology, Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Dick Tibboel
Meindert Danhof
Catherijne A J Knibbe
Centre for Human Drug Research · NLErasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of morphine in paediatrics have been widely studied using different approaches and modelling techniques. In this review, we explore advantages and disadvantages of the different data analysis techniques that have been applied, with specific focus on the accuracy of morphine clearance predictions by reported paediatric pharmacokinetic models. Twenty paediatric studies reported a wide range in morphine clearance values using traditional, rather descriptive methods. Clearance values were expressed per kilogram bodyweight, while maturation in clearance was described by comparing mean clearance per kilogram bodyweight between age-stratified subgroups. Population modelling allows for the analysis of sparse data, thereby limiting the burden to individual patients. Using this technique, continuous maturation profiles can be obtained on the basis of either fixed allometric scaling or comprehensive covariate analysis. While the models based on fixed allometric scaling resulted in complex maturation functions, all three paediatric population models for morphine yielded quite similar clearance predictions. The largest difference in clearance predictions between these three population models occurred in the first months of life, particularly in preterm neonates. Morphine clearance predictions by a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model were based on many continuous equations describing changes in underlying physiological processes across the full paediatric age range, and resulted in similar clearance predictions as well. However, preterm neonates could not be integrated in this model. In conclusion, the value of paediatric pharmacokinetic models is mostly dependent on clearance predictions and population concentration predictions, rather than on the individual description of data. For most pharmacokinetic models, however, the assessment of model performance was very limited and the accuracy of morphine clearance predictions as well as population concentration predictions was confirmed by formal evaluation and validation procedures for only one model.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnalgesics, OpioidChildHumansMetabolic Clearance RateMorphineAnalgesics, OpioidMorphine

Identifiers

PMID23018467
OpenAlexW1570325828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.