Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23018281›Full record

Trial reportClinical drug investigation2012

A 6-week, randomized, multicentre, open-label study comparing efficacy and tolerability of amisulpride at a starting dose of 400 mg/day versus 800 mg/day in patients with acute exacerbations of schizophrenia.

Seung Jae Lee, Jong Hun Lee, Sung Won Jung, Bon Hoon Koo, Tae Young Choi, Kwang Hun Lee

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Clinical Usefulness of Amisulpride Add-on Therapy in Schizophrenia Patients without Treatment Response to Second-generation Antipsychotics.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Seung Jae LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Jong Hun Lee
Sung Won Jung
Bon Hoon Koo
Tae Young Choi
Kwang Hun Lee
Catholic University of Daegu · KRDongguk University · KRKeimyung University · KRKyungpook National University · KRYeungnam University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt has been suggested that neither dose titration nor the use of a loading dose was required for amisulpride and that 800 mg/day could be given from the first day with a low risk of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). However, no direct study of the need for dose titration has been conducted.

objectiveThis study aimed to compare the efficacy, tolerability and subjective experience of amisulpride between a group receiving an initial dose of 800 mg/day (AMI-800 group) and a group titrating up from an initial dose of 400 mg/day (AMI-400 group) over a period of 6 weeks.

methodsA total of 68 patients with acute exacerbations of schizophrenia participated in this 6-week randomized, multicentre, open-label study of amisulpride. Thirty patients were randomly assigned to the group that received an initial dose of 400 mg/day, which was then titrated up during the first 4 weeks following a fixed schedule. Thirty-eight patients were randomly assigned to the group receiving an initial dose of amisulpride 800 mg/day, which they took until the end of the fourth week. During the fifth and sixth weeks, the doses were adjusted flexibly in both groups. Our primary outcome measures were the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale and the changes over time in the total and subscale scores of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).

resultsWe found no significant between-group differences in clinical improvement on the CGI and the PANSS. However, when responders were defined as those patients who experienced at least a 30 % reduction in the PANSS total scores obtained at baseline, a higher proportion of those in the AMI-800 group met the criterion for responsiveness from week 4 (week 4: 68.4 % vs 40.0 %, p = 0.02; week 6: 71.1 % vs 43.3 %, p = 0.02). Irrespective of treatment group, significant proportions of patients developed hyperprolactinaemia (86 %) and EPS (35 %). However, no statistically significant differences in the overall incidence of adverse events were observed between the two treatment groups. There were also no group differences in subjective quality of life and attitudes toward antipsychotic medication.

conclusionThese results suggest that it may be useful to begin therapy, especially for acute exacerbations of schizophrenia, with an initial dose of amisulpride 800 mg/day to obtain maximal efficacy without any significant side effects.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAmisulprideAnalysis of VarianceAntipsychotic AgentsChi-Square DistributionDisease ProgressionDyskinesia, Drug-InducedFemaleHumansHyperprolactinemiaMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesQuality of LifeRepublic of KoreaAmisulprideAntipsychotic AgentsSulpiride

Identifiers

PMID23018281
OpenAlexW2155633187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.