Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23018275›Full record

ArticleJournal of inorganic biochemistry2012

Separate FeS scaffold and carrier functions for SufB₂C₂ and SufA during in vitro maturation of [2Fe2S] Fdx.

Harsimranjit K Chahal, F Wayne Outten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of inorganic biochemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. SmsB-SmsC machinery inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Fe-S cluster biogenesis by the bacterial Suf pathway.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular cell research · 2020
    Review
  9. Biosynthesis of Sulfur-Containing Small Biomolecules in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. The plastidialThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2020
    Article
  11. Fe-S cluster assembly in the supergroup Excavata.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2018
    Review
  12. Iron-sulfur clusters biogenesis by the SUF machinery: close to the molecular mechanism understanding.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2018
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Iron-sulfur cluster exchange reactions mediated by the human Nfu protein.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Harsimranjit K ChahalDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA. hchahal@purdue.edu
F Wayne Outten

Funding

Characterization of the Suf Fe-S Cluster Biosynthesis Pathway Under StressR01GM081706 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI OUTTEN, FRANKLIN WAYNE · 2007 to 2011
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM81706NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iron-sulfur (FeS) clusters are inorganic cofactors required for a variety of biological processes. In vivo biogenesis of FeS clusters proceeds via complex pathways involving multiple protein complexes. In the Suf FeS cluster biogenesis system, SufB may be a scaffold for nascent FeS cluster assembly whereas SufA is proposed to act as either a scaffold or an FeS cluster carrier from the scaffold to target apo-proteins. However, SufB can form multiple stable complexes with other Suf proteins, such as SufB(2)C(2) and SufBC(2)D and the specific functions of these complexes in FeS cluster assembly are not clear. Here we compare the ability of the SufB(2)C(2) and SufBC(2)D complexes as well as SufA to promote in vitro maturation of the [2Fe2S] ferredoxin (Fdx). We found that SufB(2)C(2) was most proficient as a scaffold for de novo assembly of holo-Fdx using sulfide and iron as freely available building blocks while SufA was best at direct transfer of a pre-formed FeS cluster to Fdx. Furthermore, cluster transfer from [4Fe4S] SufB(2)C(2) or SufBC(2)D to Fdx will proceed through a SufA intermediate to Fdx if SufA is present. Finally, addition of ATP repressed cluster transfer from [4Fe4S] SufB(2)C(2) to Fdx and from SufBC(2)D to [2Fe2S] SufA or Fdx. These studies indicate that SufB(2)C(2) can serve as a terminal scaffold to load the SufA FeS cluster carrier for in vitro maturation of [2Fe2S] enzymes like Fdx. This work is the first to systematically compare the cluster transfer rates of a scaffold (SufB) to the transfer rates of a carrier (SufA) under the same conditions to the same target enzyme and is also the first to reconstitute the full transfer pathway (from scaffold to carrier to target enzyme) in a single reaction.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphateBase SequenceCarrier ProteinsCircular DichroismDNA PrimersFerredoxinsIn Vitro TechniquesIron-Sulfur ProteinsAdenosine TriphosphateCarrier ProteinsDNA PrimersFerredoxinsIron-Sulfur Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23018275
PMCPMC3483452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.