Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23018195›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2012

Evaluation of bone regeneration using the rat critical size calvarial defect.

Patrick P Spicer, James D Kretlow, Simon Young, John A Jansen, F Kurtis Kasper, Antonios G Mikos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 284 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
284citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

284 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Boosting Sensory Nerve-to-Bone Interactions Enhances Hedgehog Mediated Calvarial Bone Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. FeBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

224 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patrick P SpicerDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
James D Kretlow
Simon Young
John A Jansen
F Kurtis Kasper
Antonios G Mikos

Funding

In Situ Hardening Cellular Constructs for Craniofacial Bone RegenerationR01DE017441 · NIDCR · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI MIKOS, ANTONIOS G. · 2008 to 2012
$1.6M
PROMOTION OF ALVEOLAR SOCKET HEALING WITH BIOPOLYMERSR01DE015164 · NIDCR · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI MIKOS, ANTONIOS G. · 2004 to 2008
$1.4M
BONE REGENERATION BY OSTEOBLAST TRANSPLANTATIONR01AR042639 · NIAMS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI MIKOS, ANTONIOS G. · 2002 to 2006
$1.2M
Regulated Osteochondrogenesis of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Using Gene DeliveryR21AR056076 · NIAMS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI MIKOS, ANTONIOS G. · 2008 to 2009
$360k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR042639NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR42639NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR056076NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR56076NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE015164NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE017441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal models that are reliably reproducible, appropriate analogs to the clinical condition they are used to investigate, and that offer minimal morbidity and periprocedural mortality to the subject, are the keystone to the preclinical development of translational technologies. For bone tissue engineering, a number of small animal models exist. Here we describe the protocol for one such model, the rat calvarial defect. This versatile model allows for evaluation of biomaterials and bone tissue engineering approaches within a reproducible, non-load-bearing orthotopic site. Crucial steps for ensuring appropriate experimental control and troubleshooting tips learned through extensive experience with this model are provided. The surgical procedure itself takes ∼30 min to complete, with ∼2 h of perioperative care, and tissue collection is generally performed 4-12 weeks postoperatively. Several analytical techniques are presented, which evaluate the cellular and extracellular matrix components, functionality and mineralization, including histological, mechanical and radiographic methods.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationModels, AnimalRatsAnimalsRats, Inbred F344Reproducibility of ResultsSkullTissue Engineering

Identifiers

PMID23018195
PMCPMC3513397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.