Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23017375›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical Internet research2012

The smartphone in medicine: a review of current and potential use among physicians and students.

Errol Ozdalga, Ark Ozdalga, Neera Ahuja

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical Internet research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03658915 (Validity and Reliability of Smartphone Use in Measuring Joint Position Sense in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 205 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
205citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03658915 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Validity and Reliability of Smartphone Use in Measuring Joint Position Sense in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

TypeobservationalSponsorAliaa Rehan YoussefRan2018 to 2019Enrolled33ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsSmartphone application (Goniometer Pro )
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

205 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Smartphone-Based Hand Function Assessment: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Smartphone Addiction and Associated Health Outcomes in Adult Populations: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Criteria for assessing the quality of mHealth apps: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Pooled it
  8. Pain Assessment--Can it be Done with a Computerised System? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The use of communication applications in orthopaedics: a scoping review.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026
    Article

145 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Errol OzdalgaStanford University Hospital, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. eozdalga@stanford.edu
Ark Ozdalga
Neera Ahuja

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvancements in technology have always had major impacts in medicine. The smartphone is one of the most ubiquitous and dynamic trends in communication, in which one's mobile phone can also be used for communicating via email, performing Internet searches, and using specific applications. The smartphone is one of the fastest growing sectors in the technology industry, and its impact in medicine has already been significant.

objectiveTo provide a comprehensive and up-to-date summary of the role of the smartphone in medicine by highlighting the ways in which it can enhance continuing medical education, patient care, and communication. We also examine the evidence base for this technology.

methodsWe conducted a review of all published uses of the smartphone that could be applicable to the field of medicine and medical education with the exclusion of only surgical-related uses.

resultsIn the 60 studies that were identified, we found many uses for the smartphone in medicine; however, we also found that very few high-quality studies exist to help us understand how best to use this technology.

conclusionsWhile the smartphone's role in medicine and education appears promising and exciting, more high-quality studies are needed to better understand the role it will have in this field. We recommend popular smartphone applications for physicians that are lacking in evidence and discuss future studies to support their use.

Indexed as

Cell PhonePhysiciansStudents, MedicalDelivery of Health CareHumans

Identifiers

PMID23017375
PMCPMC3510747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.