Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23016935›Full record

ArticleEvolution & development

Drosophila sex combs as a model of evolutionary innovations.

Artyom Kopp

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution & development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Morphological innovation without gene co-option: thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A developmental atlas of male terminalia across twelve species ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Sex-biased expression is associated with chromatin state inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Role of the Forkhead Transcription Factors Fd4 and Fd5 DuringFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  19. Influence of theJournal of genetics · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Artyom KoppDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California - Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA. akopp@ucdavis.edu
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Genetic and Developmental Mechanisms of Evolutionary InnovationsR01GM082843 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KOPP, ARTYOM · 2009 to 2012
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5-R01GM082843-02NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM082843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diversity of animal and plant forms is shaped by nested evolutionary innovations. Understanding the genetic and molecular changes responsible for these innovations is therefore one of the key goals of evolutionary biology. From the genetic point of view, the origin of novel traits implies the origin of new regulatory pathways to control their development. To understand how these new pathways are assembled in the course of evolution, we need model systems that combine relatively recent innovations with a powerful set of genetic and molecular tools. One such model is provided by the Drosophila sex comb-a male-specific morphological structure that evolved in a relatively small lineage related to the model species D. melanogaster. Our extensive knowledge of sex comb development in D. melanogaster provides the basis for investigating the genetic changes responsible for sex comb origin and diversification. At the same time, sex combs can change on microevolutionary timescales and differ spectacularly among closely related species, providing opportunities for direct genetic analysis and for integrating developmental and population-genetic approaches. Sex comb evolution is associated with the origin of novel interactions between Hox and sex determination genes. Activity of the sex determination pathway was brought under the control of the Hox code to become segment-specific, while Hox gene expression became sexually dimorphic. At the same time, both Hox and sex determination genes were integrated into the intrasegmental spatial patterning network, and acquired new joint downstream targets. Phylogenetic analysis shows that similar sex comb morphologies evolved independently in different lineages. Convergent evolution at the phenotypic level reflects convergent changes in the expression of Hox and sex determination genes, involving both independent gains and losses of regulatory interactions. However, the downstream cell-differentiation programs have diverged between species, and in some lineages, similar adult morphologies are produced by different morphogenetic mechanisms. These features make the sex comb an excellent model for examining not only the genetic changes responsible for its evolution, but also the cellular processes that translate DNA sequence changes into morphological diversity. The origin and diversification of sex combs provides insights into the roles of modularity, cooption, and regulatory changes in evolutionary innovations, and can serve as a model for understanding the origin of the more drastic novelties that define higher order taxa.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsExtremitiesGenes, HomeoboxGenetic VariationMaleModels, AnimalPhylogenySex Determination ProcessesDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23016935
PMCPMC3462374
OpenAlexW1592091062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.