Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23016030›Full record

ArticleSports health2011

Sex differences in knee abduction during landing: a systematic review.

Daniel W Carson, Kevin R Ford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Management after acute injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), part 2: management of the ACL-injured patient.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sex-Specific Brain Activations during Single-Leg Exercise.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Jump performance in male and female football players.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel W CarsonCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Sports Medicine Biodynamics Center and Human Performance Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Kevin R Ford
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

Sex differences in ACL injury risk factors emerge during adolescent growthR03AR057551 · NIAMS · HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, KEVIN RAY · 2010 to 2012
$226k
NIAMS NIH HHS R03 AR057551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFemales suffer injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament at rates significantly higher than males. Frontal plane knee motion and load have been identified as major risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury and in turn have been examined extensively.

methodsA systematic review of MEDLINE, CINHAL, and SportDISCUS was performed (1982-June 2010). Criteria for inclusion were the use of 3-dimensional analyses of frontal plane knee motion and moments during landing between males and females.

resultsTwenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Sixty-three percent of included studies identified sex differences in knee abduction when landing across a variety of landing conditions.

conclusionsFemales appear to land with increased knee abduction motion compared with males in most biomechanics studies.

Indexed as

anterior cruciate ligamentknee injury risksex differencesvalgus

Identifiers

PMID23016030
PMCPMC3445198
OpenAlexW2031667865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.