Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23015674›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2012

Culture-dependent and -independent investigations of microbial diversity on urinary catheters.

Yijuan Xu, Claus Moser, Waleed Abu Al-Soud, Søren Sørensen, Niels Høiby, Per Halkjær Nielsen, Trine Rolighed Thomsen

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Biofilm and Equine Limb Wounds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Do Mixed-Species Biofilms Dominate in Chronic Infections?-Need forFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  12. Methods Used for the Eradication of Staphylococcal Biofilms.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yijuan XuDepartment of Biotechnology, Chemistry, and Environmental Engineering, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Claus Moser
Waleed Abu Al-Soud
Søren Sørensen
Niels Høiby
Per Halkjær Nielsen
Trine Rolighed Thomsen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catheter-associated urinary tract infection is caused by bacteria, which ascend the catheter along its external or internal surface to the bladder and subsequently develop into biofilms on the catheter and uroepithelium. Antibiotic-treated bacteria and bacteria residing in biofilm can be difficult to culture. In this study we used culture-based and 16S rRNA gene-based culture-independent methods (fingerprinting, cloning, and pyrosequencing) to determine the microbial diversity of biofilms on 24 urinary catheters. Most of the patients were catheterized for <30 days and had undergone recent antibiotic treatment. In addition, the corresponding urine samples for 16 patients were cultured. We found that gene analyses of the catheters were consistent with cultures of the corresponding urine samples for the presence of bacteria but sometimes discordant for the identity of the species. Cultures of catheter tips detected bacteria more frequently than urine cultures and gene analyses; coagulase-negative staphylococci were, in particular, cultured much more often from catheter tips, indicating potential contamination of the catheter tips during sampling. The external and internal surfaces of 19 catheters were separately analyzed by molecular methods, and discordant results were found in six catheters, suggesting that bacterial colonization intra- and extraluminally may be different. Molecular analyses showed that most of the species identified in this study were known uropathogens, and infected catheters were generally colonized by one to two species, probably due to antibiotic usage and short-term catheterization. In conclusion, our data showed that culture-independent molecular methods did not detect bacteria from urinary catheters more frequently than culture-based methods.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBacteriaBacteriological TechniquesDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalHumansMetagenomicsMolecular Sequence DataRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNAUrinary CathetersDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID23015674
PMCPMC3502987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.