Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23015261›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2012

Elevated nuclear expression of the SMRT corepressor in breast cancer is associated with earlier tumor recurrence.

Carolyn L Smith, Ilenia Migliaccio, Vaishali Chaubal, Meng-Fen Wu, Margaret C Pace, Ryan Hartmaier, Shiming Jiang, Dean P Edwards, M Carolina Gutiérrez, Susan G Hilsenbeck and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Dual-mechanism estrogen receptor inhibitors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carolyn L SmithDepartment of Molecular & Cellular Biology, BCM130, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA. carolyns@bcm.edu
Ilenia Migliaccio
Vaishali Chaubal
Meng-Fen Wu
Margaret C Pace
Ryan Hartmaier
Shiming Jiang
Dean P Edwards
M Carolina Gutiérrez
Susan G Hilsenbeck
Steffi Oesterreich
Baylor College of Medicine · USChildren's Cancer Center · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor BiologyP30CA125123 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI DAVID R ROWLEY · 2007 to 2026
$73.9M
TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENES IN BREAST CANCER DEVELOPMENTP50CA058183 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR SAN ANT · PI OSBORNE, C KENT · 1992 to 2012
$30.9M
ESTROGEN RECEPTOR-COREGULATOR FUNCTIONAL INTERACTIONSR01DK053002 · NIDDK · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SMITH, CAROLYN LOUISE · 1997 to 2018
$4.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA125123NCI NIH HHS P30CA125123NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058183NCI NIH HHS P50CA058183NIDDK NIH HHS DK53002NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK053002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptor (SMRT), also known as nuclear corepressor 2 (NCOR2) is a transcriptional corepressor for multiple members of the nuclear receptor superfamily of transcription factors, including estrogen receptor-α (ERα). In the classical model of corepressor action, SMRT binds to antiestrogen-bound ERα at target promoters and represses ERα transcriptional activity and gene expression. Herein SMRT mRNA and protein expression was examined in a panel of 30 breast cancer cell lines. Expression of both parameters was found to vary considerably amongst lines and the correlation between protein and mRNA expression was very poor (R (2) = 0.0775). Therefore, SMRT protein levels were examined by immunohistochemical staining of a tissue microarray of 866 patients with stage I-II breast cancer. Nuclear and cytoplasmic SMRT were scored separately according to the Allred score. The majority of tumors (67 %) were negative for cytoplasmic SMRT, which when detected was found at very low levels. In contrast, nuclear SMRT was broadly detected. There was no significant difference in time to recurrence (TTR) according to SMRT expression levels in the ERα-positive tamoxifen-treated patients (P = 0.297) but the difference was significant in the untreated patients (P = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, ERα-positive tamoxifen-untreated patients with high nuclear SMRT expression (SMRT 5-8, i.e., 2nd to 4th quartile) had a shorter TTR (HR = 1.94, 95 % CI, 1.24-3.04; P = 0.004) while there was no association with SMRT expression for ERα-positive tamoxifen-treated patients. There was no association between SMRT expression and overall survival for patients, regardless of whether they received tamoxifen. Thus while SMRT protein expression was not predictive of outcome after antiestrogen therapy, it may have value in predicting tumor recurrence in patients not receiving adjuvant tamoxifen therapy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticCell Line, TumorCell NucleolusEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingNuclear Receptor Co-Repressor 2Survival AnalysisTamoxifenTissue Array AnalysisESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphaNuclear Receptor Co-Repressor 2Tamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID23015261
PMCPMC3511772
OpenAlexW2025785159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.