Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23015072›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2013

KRAS p.G13D mutations are associated with sensitivity to anti-EGFR antibody treatment in colorectal cancer cell lines.

Isabelle Messner, Giuseppe Cadeddu, Wolfgang Huckenbeck, Helen J Knowles, Helmut E Gabbert, Stephan E Baldus, Karl-Ludwig Schaefer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Systematic and precise interventions for KRAS-mutant cancers.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Isabelle MessnerMedical Faculty, Institute of Pathology, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany.
Giuseppe Cadeddu
Wolfgang Huckenbeck
Helen J Knowles
Helmut E Gabbert
Stephan E Baldus
Karl-Ludwig Schaefer
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DENuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK MP/19200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTargeted therapies using the anti-EGFR antibodies panitumumab (Pmab) or cetuximab (Cmab) are currently restricted to patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma whose tumours do not show a mutation in KRAS. However, recent retrospective studies indicated that patients with tumours mutated in codon 13 of KRAS may benefit from treatment with Cmab in contrast to patients with tumours mutated in KRAS codon 12.

methodsTo study the functional impact of the subtype of KRAS mutations on the efficiency of EGFR-targeted therapies, we correlated the KRAS mutation status of 15 colorectal carcinoma cell lines with the in vitro sensitivity of these cells to Cmab/Pmab. Mutations in the potential predictive biomarkers BRAF and PIK3CA as well as protein expression of EGFR and PTEN were also determined.

resultsFour out of seven KRAS-mutated cell lines were characterised by the p.G13D mutation. Treatment of these cells using Cmab/Pmab induced a significant growth inhibition in contrast to cell lines showing a KRAS mutation at codon 12 or 61. Out of the eight KRAS wild-type cell lines, five were insensitive to Cmab/Pmab. These cell lines were characterised either by BRAF mutation or by absence of EGFR or PTEN protein expression.

conclusionsSince KRAS p.G13D-mutated tumour cells may respond to EGFR-targeted therapy, we suggest including subtype analysis of KRAS mutations in prospective clinical trials. In KRAS wild-type tumour cells, BRAF mutations and loss of EGFR or PTEN expression may lead to resistance to EGFR-targeted therapy and should be considered as additional negative predictive biomarkers.

Indexed as

MutationAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCetuximabClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesColorectal NeoplasmsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmErbB ReceptorsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansPanitumumabPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsBRAF protein, humanCetuximabClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesErbB ReceptorsKRAS protein, humanPanitumumabPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPIK3CA protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23015072
PMCPMC11824176
OpenAlexW2067265449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.