ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2013
KRAS p.G13D mutations are associated with sensitivity to anti-EGFR antibody treatment in colorectal cancer cell lines.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Cetuximab combination with cytokine induced killer cells effectively inhibit conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma in vitro.BMC immunology · 2026Article
- Systematic and precise interventions for KRAS-mutant cancers.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Calendula officinalis as a source of KRAS-targeted anticancer agents: a comprehensive computational assessment.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Article
- Review
- The Prognostic Impact of KRAS G12C Mutation in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study.The oncologist · 2021Observational
- Study of Ras Mutations' Prognostic Value in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: STORIA Analysis.Cancers · 2020Article
- Emergence of KRAS p.G13D mutation and acquired resistance to cetuximab in colorectal cancer with vulvar metastasis: A case report.Medicine · 2019Article
- Isoform-Specific Destabilization of the Active Site Reveals a Molecular Mechanism of Intrinsic Activation of KRas G13D.Cell reports · 2019Article
- Variation in KRAS driver substitution distributions between tumor types is determined by both mutation and natural selection.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- PRMT1-mediated methylation of the EGF receptor regulates signaling and cetuximab response.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2015Article
- KRAS and BRAF gene mutations and DNA mismatch repair status in Chinese colorectal carcinoma patients.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Article
- Analyses of clinicopathological, molecular, and prognostic associations of KRAS codon 61 and codon 146 mutations in colorectal cancer: cohort study and literature review.Molecular cancer · 2014Article
- KRAS mutations: variable incidences in a Brazilian cohort of 8,234 metastatic colorectal cancer patients.BMC gastroenterology · 2014Article
- Computational analysis of KRAS mutations: implications for different effects on the KRAS p.G12D and p.G13D mutations.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTargeted therapies using the anti-EGFR antibodies panitumumab (Pmab) or cetuximab (Cmab) are currently restricted to patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma whose tumours do not show a mutation in KRAS. However, recent retrospective studies indicated that patients with tumours mutated in codon 13 of KRAS may benefit from treatment with Cmab in contrast to patients with tumours mutated in KRAS codon 12.
methodsTo study the functional impact of the subtype of KRAS mutations on the efficiency of EGFR-targeted therapies, we correlated the KRAS mutation status of 15 colorectal carcinoma cell lines with the in vitro sensitivity of these cells to Cmab/Pmab. Mutations in the potential predictive biomarkers BRAF and PIK3CA as well as protein expression of EGFR and PTEN were also determined.
resultsFour out of seven KRAS-mutated cell lines were characterised by the p.G13D mutation. Treatment of these cells using Cmab/Pmab induced a significant growth inhibition in contrast to cell lines showing a KRAS mutation at codon 12 or 61. Out of the eight KRAS wild-type cell lines, five were insensitive to Cmab/Pmab. These cell lines were characterised either by BRAF mutation or by absence of EGFR or PTEN protein expression.
conclusionsSince KRAS p.G13D-mutated tumour cells may respond to EGFR-targeted therapy, we suggest including subtype analysis of KRAS mutations in prospective clinical trials. In KRAS wild-type tumour cells, BRAF mutations and loss of EGFR or PTEN expression may lead to resistance to EGFR-targeted therapy and should be considered as additional negative predictive biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.