Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23014834›Full record

ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2013

Fast-track surgery: procedure-specific aspects and future direction.

Daniel Ansari, Luca Gianotti, Jörg Schröder, Roland Andersson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04584060 (Conventional VS Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Emergency GIT Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04584060 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Conventional VS Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Emergency GIT Surgery

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAssiut UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsPatient Presented With Acute Abdomen, Patient Undergoing Urgent GIT SurgeryArmsERAS protocols, Early oral feeding, Prophylaxis against DVT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. A comparative study of 'fast-track' versus traditional peri-operative care protocols in gastrointestinal surgeries.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2014
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel AnsariDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Luca Gianotti
Jörg Schröder
Roland Andersson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFast-track (FT) surgery can be defined as a coordinated perioperative approach aimed at reducing surgical stress and facilitating postoperative recovery. The objective of this review was to examine the literature on the procedure-specific application of FT surgery. DISCUSSION: The concept of FT rehabilitation has been applied mainly in colorectal surgery, but positive data have appeared also in other areas such as orthopedic, hepatopancreaticobiliary, urological, upper gastrointestinal, gynecological, thoracic, vascular, endocrine, breast, and pediatric surgeries. There is very little experience with comprehensive FT programs in cardiac surgery or trauma. Quantitative analysis from randomized trials and cohort studies suggest that FT is effective in reducing hospital stay without increased adverse events. Other benefits of the FT approach include a reduction in complications, ileus, fatigue, pain, and hospital expenses. However, despite clear benefits of FT care, implementation in daily practice has been slow. Further efforts must be undertaken to secure implementation in routine clinical practice. Standardized FT protocols should be provided on a procedure-specific basis.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesCost SavingsEvidence-Based MedicineGermanyHospital CostsHumansLength of StayMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPerioperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID23014834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.