Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23014519›Full record

ArticleAIDS (London, England)2013

Modelling the global competing risks of a potential interaction between injectable hormonal contraception and HIV risk.

Ailsa R Butler, Jennifer A Smith, Chelsea B Polis, Simon Gregson, David Stanton, Timothy B Hallett

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02905890 (Hormonal Contraception and Bacterial Vaginosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02905890 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Hormonal Contraception and Bacterial Vaginosis (HCBV): The Effect of Norethisterone Enanthate on Recurrent Bacterial Vaginosis Among Women at High Risk for HIV Infection in Kampala, Uganda

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineRan2017 to 2019Enrolled250ConditionsBacterial Vaginosis, HIVArmsNorethisterone enantate, Condoms
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Estradiol Enhances Antiviral CD4Journal of virology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Planning for Outcomes (PGlobal health, science and practice · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ailsa R Butler *Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Jennifer A Smith *Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Chelsea B PolisUSAID, Washington DC, USA.
Simon GregsonDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
David StantonUSAID, Washington DC, USA.
Timothy B HallettDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Imperial College London · GBUnited States Agency for International Development · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K010174/1Wellcome Trust 084401Wellcome Trust 090285Wellcome Trust 090285/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome, but not all, observational studies have suggested an increase in the risk of HIV acquisition for women using injectable hormonal contraception (IHC).

methodsWe used country-level data to explore the effects of reducing IHC use on the number of HIV infections, the number of live births and the resulting net consequences on AIDS deaths and maternal mortality for each country.

resultsHigh IHC use coincides with high HIV incidence primarily in southern and eastern Africa. If IHC increases the risk of HIV acquisition, this could generate 27 000-130 000 infections per year globally, 87-88% of which occur in this region. Reducing IHC use could result in fewer HIV infections but also a substantial increase in live births and maternal mortality in countries with high IHC use, high birth rates and high maternal mortality: mainly southern and eastern Africa, South-East Asia, and Central and South America. For most countries, the net impact of reducing IHC use on maternal and AIDS-related deaths is dependent on the magnitude of the assumed IHC-HIV interaction.

conclusionsIf IHC use increases HIV acquisition risk, reducing IHC could reduce new HIV infections; however, this must be balanced against other important consequences, including unintended pregnancy, which impacts maternal and infant mortality. Unless the true effect size approaches a relative risk of 2.19, it is unlikely that reductions in IHC could result in public health benefit, with the possible exception of those countries in southern Africa with the largest HIV epidemics.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAdolescentAdultAfrica, EasternAfrica, SouthernCondomsContraceptive AgentsFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalInjectionsMiddle AgedPregnancyPrevalenceContraceptive Agents

Identifiers

PMID23014519
PMCPMC4862571
OpenAlexW2088697128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.