ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2013
Three-dimensional-engineered matrix to study cancer stem cells and tumorsphere formation: effect of matrix modulus.
Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retraction: Optimum 3D Matrix Stiffness for Maintenance of Cancer Stem Cells Is Dependent on Tissue Origin of Cancer Cells.PloS one · 2026Article
- Tumor organoids in cancer medicine: from model systems to natural compound screening.Pharmaceutical biology · 2025Review
- Liver-Specific Extracellular Matrix Enables High-Fidelity Patient-Derived Hepatocellular Carcinoma Xenograft Models.Biomaterials research · 2025Article
- Effect of Matrix Stiffness and Hepatocyte Growth Factor on Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells in Decellularized Extracellular Matrix-Based Hydrogels.Macromolecular bioscience · 2024Article
- Tumor matrix stiffness provides fertile soil for cancer stem cells.Cancer cell international · 2023Review
- Differential contractility regulates cancer stem cell migration.Biophysical journal · 2023Article
- Functional biomaterials for biomimetic 3D in vitro tumor microenvironment modeling.In vitro models · 2023Review
- Current Advances of Three-Dimensional Bioprinting Application in Dentistry: A Scoping Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Engineered colorectal cancer tissue recapitulates key attributes of a patient-derived xenograft tumor line.Biofabrication · 2022Article
- The Patient-Derived Cancer Organoids: Promises and Challenges as Platforms for Cancer Discovery.Cancers · 2022Review
- Alginate-based 3D cell culture technique to evaluate the half-maximal inhibitory concentration: an in vitro model of anticancer drug study for anaplastic thyroid carcinoma.Thyroid research · 2021Article
- Immunosuppressive mesenchymal stem cells aggregates incorporating hydrogel microspheres promote an in vitro invasion of cancer cells.Regenerative therapy · 2021Article
- Mechanical stimuli and matrix properties modulate cancer spheroid growth in three-dimensional gelatin culture.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020Article
- Three-Dimensional Culture System of Cancer Cells Combined with Biomaterials for Drug Screening.Cancers · 2020Review
- Bioinspired One Cell Culture Isolates Highly Tumorigenic and Metastatic Cancer Stem Cells Capable of Multilineage Differentiation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2020Article
- Article
- Cell Bioprinting: The 3D-Bioplotter™ Case.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Article
- Cell-Laden Hydrogel as a Clinical-Relevant 3D Model for Analyzing Neuroblastoma Growth, Immunophenotype, and Susceptibility to Therapies.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Article
- Untangling the response of bone tumor cells and bone forming cells to matrix stiffness and adhesion ligand density by means of hydrogels.Biomaterials · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Maintenance of cancer stem cells (CSCs) is regulated by the tumor microenvironment. Synthetic hydrogels provide the flexibility to design three-dimensional (3D) matrices to isolate and study individual factors in the tumor microenvironment. The objective of this work was to investigate the effect of matrix modulus on tumorsphere formation by breast cancer cells and maintenance of CSCs in an inert microenvironment without the interference of other factors. In that regard, 4T1 mouse breast cancer cells were encapsulated in inert polyethylene glycol diacrylate hydrogels and the effect of matrix modulus on tumorsphere formation and expression of CSC markers was investigated. The gel modulus had a strong effect on tumorsphere formation and the effect was bimodal. Tumorsphere formation and expression of CSC markers peaked after 8 days of culture. At day 8, as the matrix modulus was increased from 2.5 kPa to 5.3, 26.1, and 47.1 kPa, the average tumorsphere size changed from 37±6 μm to 57±6, 20±4, and 12±2 μm, respectively; cell number density in the gel changed from 0.8±0.1×10⁵ cells/mL to 1.7±0.2×10⁵, 0.4±0.1×10⁵, and 0.2±0.1×10⁵ cells/mL after initial encapsulation of 0.14×10⁵ cells/mL; and the expression of CD44 breast CSC marker changed from 17±4-fold to 38±9-, 3±1-, and 2±1-fold increase compared with the initial level. Similar results were obtained with MCF7 human breast carcinoma cells. Mouse 4T1 and human MCF7 cells encapsulated in the gel with 5.3 kPa modulus formed the largest tumorspheres and highest density of tumorspheres, and had highest expression of breast CSC markers CD44 and ABCG2. The inert polyethylene glycol hydrogel can be used as a model-engineered 3D matrix to study the role of individual factors in the tumor microenvironment on tumorigenesis and maintenance of CSCs without the interference of other factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.