Trial reportHealth and quality of life outcomes2012
The Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) in clinical trials: cross-cultural validation in venous thromboembolism patients.
Trial report in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibitor Rivaroxaban in Patients With Acute Symptomatic Deep-Vein Thrombosis or Pulmonary Embolism
Apixaban for the Secondary Prevention of Thromboembolism: a Prospective Randomized Outcome Pilot Study Among Patients With the AntiphosPholipid Syndrome
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patient-reported outcome measures for medication treatment satisfaction: a systematic review of measure development and measurement properties.BMC medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Patient-Reported Outcomes in Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review of the Literature, Current Challenges, and Ways Forward.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Pooled it
- A systematic review of patient-reported outcomes associated with the use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019Pooled it
- Warfarin Patient Self-Management in the US Health Care System: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Coordination of oral anticoagulant care at hospital discharge (COACHeD): pilot randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Apixaban compared with warfarin to prevent thrombosis in thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome: a randomized trial.Blood advances · 2022Trial
- Impact of Switching From a Vitamin K Antagonist to Rivaroxaban on Satisfaction With Anticoagulation Therapy: The XANTUS-ACTS Substudy.Clinical cardiology · 2016Trial
- Renal Vein Thrombosis: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bleeding-related quality of life in older adults: Psychometric evaluation of the HEmorrhage Life Impact indeX (HELIX).Thrombosis research · 2026Article
- Patient perspectives on post-operative direct oral anticoagulant for venous thromboembolism prevention in patients with gynecologic cancers undergoing laparotomy.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2026Article
- Capturing the late complications of venous thromboembolism.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Review
- A comparative study of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D scales based on patients receiving oral anticoagulant therapy.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2026Article
- Need for Engagement in Stroke Prevention Shared Decision-Making in Older Adults with Atrial Fibrillation and Multimorbidity.Advances in geriatric medicine and research · 2025Article
- Overcoming Barriers to Warfarin Patient Self-Management (PSM) in the US Healthcare System: Implementation Trial Study Protocol.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Post-operative anticoagulation therapy after knee or hip replacement: The role of patients' preferences in selection of therapy.Research square · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Quality of life in oncological patients with venous thromboembolic disease.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Review
- Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) is a 15-item patient-reported instrument of satisfaction with anticoagulant treatment. It includes a 12-item ACTS Burdens scale and a 3-item ACTS Benefits scale. Its role in clinical trials and other settings should be supported by evidence that it is both clinically meaningful and scientifically sound. The aim of the study was to evaluate the measurement performance of the ACTS (Dutch, Italian, French, German and English language versions) in patients with venous thromboembolism based on traditional psychometric methods.
methodsACTS Burdens and Benefits scale data from a large clinical trial (EINSTEIN DVT) involving 1336 people with venous thromboembolism were analysed at both the scale and item level. Five key psychometric properties were examined using traditional psychometric methods: acceptability, scaling assumptions, reliability (including internal consistency reliability, test-retest reproducibility); validity (including known groups and discriminant validity); and responsiveness. These methods of examination underpin the US Food and Drug Administration recommendations for patient-reported outcome instrument evaluation.
resultsOverall, the 12-item ACTS Burdens scale and 3-item ACTS Benefits scale met the psychometric criteria evaluated at both item and scale levels, with the exception of some relatively minor issues in the Dutch language version, which were just below reliability criteria (i.e. alpha = 0.72, test-retest intraclass correlation = 0.79). A consistent finding from item-level evaluations of aggregate endorsement frequencies and skewness suggested that response scales may be improved by reducing the number of response options from five to four.
conclusionsBoth the ACTS Burdens and ACTS Benefits scales consistently satisfied traditional reliability and validity criteria across multiple language datasets, supporting it as a clinically useful patient-reported instrument of satisfaction with anticoagulant treatment in clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00440193.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.