Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23012479›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Impact of lactobacilli on orally acquired listeriosis.

Cristel Archambaud, Marie-Anne Nahori, Guillaume Soubigou, Christophe Bécavin, Laure Laval, Pierre Lechat, Tamara Smokvina, Philippe Langella, Marc Lecuit, Pascale Cossart

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Impact of the defined Oligo-MMScientific reports · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. ComparingGut microbes · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Listeriosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  11. Microorganisms · 2025
    Review
  12. Open veterinary journal · 2025
    Article
  13. Investigating the role of theFEMS microbes · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The ProbioticMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cristel ArchambaudUnité des Interactions Bactéries-Cellules, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France.
Marie-Anne Nahori
Guillaume Soubigou
Christophe Bécavin
Laure Laval
Pierre Lechat
Tamara Smokvina
Philippe Langella
Marc Lecuit
Pascale Cossart
Inserm · FRDanone (France) · FRGenopole (France) · FRSorbonne Paris Cité · FR

Funding

European Research Council 233348European Research Council 261157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Listeria monocytogenes is a foodborne pathogen that crosses the intestinal barrier and disseminates within the host. Here, we report a unique comprehensive analysis of the impact of two Lactobacillus species, Lactobacillus paracasei CNCM I-3689 and Lactobacillus casei BL23, on L. monocytogenes and orally acquired listeriosis in a gnotobiotic humanized mouse model. We first assessed the effect of treatment with each Lactobacillus on L. monocytogenes counts in host tissues and showed that each decreases L. monocytogenes systemic dissemination in orally inoculated mice. A whole genome intestinal transcriptomic analysis revealed that each Lactobacillus changes expression of a specific subset of genes during infection, with IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) being the most affected by both lactobacilli. We also examined microRNA (miR) expression and showed that three miRs (miR-192, miR-200b, and miR-215) are repressed during L. monocytogenes infection. Treatment with each Lactobacillus increased miR-192 expression, whereas only L. casei association increased miR-200b and miR-215 expression. Finally, we showed that treatment with each Lactobacillus significantly reshaped the L. monocytogenes transcriptome and up-regulated transcription of L. monocytogenes genes encoding enzymes allowing utilization of intestinal carbon and nitrogen sources in particular genes involved in propanediol and ethanolamine catabolism and cobalamin biosynthesis. Altogether, these data reveal that the modulation of L. monocytogenes infection by treatment with lactobacilli correlates with a decrease in host gene expression, in particular ISGs, miR regulation, and a dramatic reshaping of L. monocytogenes transcriptome.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibiosisGene ExpressionGenes, BacterialHost-Pathogen InteractionsInterferonsIntestinal MucosaIntestinesLacticaseibacillus caseiLactobacillusListeria monocytogenesListeriosisMiceMice, TransgenicMicroRNAsMouthInterferonsMicroRNAsMirn192 microRNA, mouseMirn200 microRNA, mouseMIRN215 microRNA, mouse

Identifiers

PMID23012479
PMCPMC3478606
OpenAlexW1979958911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.