ArticleJournal of family & community medicine2006
The profile of long-term care patients in Al-khobar and dammam, saudi arabia.
Article in Journal of family & community medicine, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The experience of informal caregiving within Saudi society: expressed needs and expectations.The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES.: To find out the profile of patients who stay more than 20 days in hospital in Al-Khobar and Al-Dammam. METHODS.: A cross sectional descriptive study was designed using a questionnaire completed by health care providers (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, and social workers) of a random sample of 159 patients out of 318 patients identified as having stayed in the hospital for more than 20 days. RESULTS.: The mean length of stay of the patients were 358.6 ±776 days in government hospitals, and 1014.4 ±1018.3 days in private hospitals. Patients were seen as stable by their doctors, 66.7% in government hospitals and 93.9% in private hospitals (statistically significant different at p<0.001. Physicians agreed that about two thirds of the patients could have been managed at home. 57.2% of the patients had no active problems. Diseases of the nervous system and sense organs accounted for 67.9% of the diagnoses, followed by endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases (37.1%), diseases of the circulatory system (32.7%), and neoplasms (1.9%). Diabetes mellitus was the commonest illness making up 53.2% and 57.1% of the long-term patients in private and government hospitals respectively. The active problems of 25% and 23.5% of the patients was tracheostomy care and ventilation respectively. CONCLUSIONS.: Long-term patients tended to stay longer in private hospitals than in government hospitals, had diseases related to the nervous and endocrine systems and nutritional metabolism, were in stable condition with no active problems, and could thus, be managed at home.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23012099PMC3410074What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.