Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23011617›Full record

ArticleJournal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine2012

Molecular ultrasound imaging using a targeted contrast agent for assessing early tumor response to antiangiogenic therapy.

Anna G Sorace, Reshu Saini, Marshall Mahoney, Kenneth Hoyt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Molecular Ultrasound Imaging.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  3. Application of Ultrasound Combined with Microbubbles for Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Molecular Ultrasound Imaging.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna G SoraceMBA, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, G082 Volker Hall, 1670 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35294-0019, USA.
Reshu Saini
Marshall Mahoney
Kenneth Hoyt
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA013148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Robert S Welner · 1985 to 2026
$165.9M
UAB CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE (CCTS) UL1: BPCAUL1RR025777 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GUAY-WOODFORD, LISA MARIE · 2008 to 2011
$22.3M
Nanotechnology in Biosensors and BioengineeringT32EB004312 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI VOHRA, YOGESH K. · 2007 to 2011
$669k
NCI NIH HHS CA13148-38NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013148NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025777NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR025777NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB004312NIBIB NIH HHS T32EB004312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesContrast-enhanced ultrasound (US) and targeted microbubbles have been shown to be advantageous for angiogenesis evaluation and disease staging in cancer. This study explored molecular US imaging of a multitargeted microbubble for assessing the early tumor response to antiangiogenic therapy.

methodsTarget receptor expression of 2LMP breast cancer cells was quantified by flow cytometric analysis and characterization established with antibodies against mouse α(V)β3- integrin, P-selectin, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. Tumor-bearing mice (n = 15 per group) underwent contrast-enhanced US imaging of multitargeted microbubbles. Microbubble accumulation was calculated by destruction-replenishment techniques and time-intensity curve analysis. On day 0, mice underwent baseline imaging. Next, therapy group mice were injected with a 0.2-mg dose of bevacizumab, and controls received matched saline injections. Imaging was repeated on days 1 and 3. After imaging was completed on day 3, the mice were euthanized and tumors excised. Histologic analysis of microvessel density and intratumoral necrosis was completed on tumor sections.

resultsOn day 3 after bevacizumab dosing, a 71.8% change in tumor vasculature was shown between the therapy and control groups (P = .01). The therapy group had a 15.4% decrease in tumor vascularity, whereas the control group had a 56.4% increase.

conclusionsMolecular US imaging of angiogenic markers can detect the early tumor response to drug therapy.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsAnimalsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorContrast MediaDrug Delivery SystemsFemaleHumansMiceMice, NudeMicrobubblesMolecular ImagingNeovascularization, PathologicTreatment OutcomeAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID23011617
PMCPMC3464103
OpenAlexW2125227270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.