ArticleWorld journal of urology2013
Influence of endourological devices on 3D reconstruction image quality using the Uro Dyna-CT.
Article in World journal of urology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Navigation systems for the percutaneous access to the kidney].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2020Review
- iPad-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a matched pair analysis compared to standard PCNL.World journal of urology · 2020Article
- Accuracy in detecting and measuring residual fragments with the Uro Dyna-CT.World journal of urology · 2015Article
- Real-time image guidance in laparoscopic liver surgery: first clinical experience with a guidance system based on intraoperative CT imaging.Surgical endoscopy · 2014Article
- Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: An opinion on its future.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe urological Dyna-CT (Uro Dyna-CT) was established in clinical use for classical imaging as well as for interventional surgery. To evaluate whether irradiation artefacts may occur during interventional surgery, we analysed the impact of different instruments on 3D reconstruction in the Uro Dyna-CT. MATERIALS AND
methodsTen different endourological instruments [ureterorenoscope (URS)-fibrescope, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) working sheath] and accessory equipments such as ureteral catheter, guide wires and stents (DJ, MJ) were introduced in a porcine renal pelvis either retrograde via the ureter or transparenchymally. Subsequently, digital fluoroscopy, standard X-ray and an Uro Dyna-CT were performed. Three colleagues evaluated the image quality independent from each other.
resultsThere were basically no limitations regarding image quality in digital fluoroscopy and standard X-ray. In the Uro Dyna-CT, only with the URS fiberscope and the PCNL working sheath, small artefacts and irradiations were detected, whereas ureteric catheter with and without wire, as well as the hydrophilic guide wire, showed no artefacts at all. The remaining material demonstrated minimal artefacts, which did not affect the image quality.
conclusionsThe Uro Dyna-CT can be used for all interventional endourological procedures using the common armamentarium and instruments without significant limitation of image quality. There are only minor limitations according a PCNL working sheath and the rigid URS. These instruments should be removed out of the examination field before performing the computed tomography and be replaced afterwards by using a safety wire.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.