ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2013
Brief report: comparability of DSM-IV and DSM-5 ASD research samples.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Effects of DSM-5 Criteria on Number of Individuals Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2015Pooled it
- How will DSM-5 affect autism diagnosis? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2014Pooled it
- Diagnostic tests for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in preschool children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Neurodevelopmental Phenotype Associated withGenes · 2025Article
- Maternal Folate Receptor Alpha Autoantibodies and Increased Fetal Nuchal Translucency as Potential Early Markers of Autism Spectrum Disorder.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Developmental Profile of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Versus Social Communication Disorder: A Pilot Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised Within DSM-5 Framework: Test of Reliability and Validity in Chinese Children.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2022Article
- Adapting and validating the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Version 2 for use with deaf children and young people.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2022Article
- Sparse Hierarchical Representation Learning on Functional Brain Networks for Prediction of Autism Severity Levels.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Hyper-Sensitivity to Pitch and Poorer Prosody Processing in Adults With Autism: An ERP Study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disorders show cognitive heterogeneity and require a person-centered approach.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Development and validation of DSM-5 based diagnostic tool for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.PloS one · 2019Article
- Comparison of DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 Criteria in Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorders in Singapore.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2018Article
- Patterns of fixation during face recognition: Differences in autism across age.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2018Article
- Diagnostic tests for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in preschool children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Review
- A Comparative Analysis of the ADOS-G and ADOS-2 Algorithms: Preliminary Findings.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2018Review
- Autism spectrum disorder: Consensus guidelines on assessment, treatment and research from the British Association for Psychopharmacology.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2018Review
- Diagnostic Utility of the ADI-R and DSM-5 in the Assessment of Latino Children and Adolescents.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2017Article
- Identifying High Ability Children with DSM-5 Autism Spectrum or Social Communication Disorder: Performance on Autism Diagnostic Instruments.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5) criteria for ASD have been criticized for being too restrictive, especially for more cognitively-able individuals. It is unclear, however, if high-functioning individuals deemed eligible for research via standardized diagnostic assessments would meet DSM-5 criteria. This study investigated the impact of DSM-5 on the diagnostic status of 498 high-functioning participants with ASD research diagnoses. The percent of participants satisfying all DSM-5-requirements varied significantly with reliance on data from the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS; 33 %) versus Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R; 83 %), highlighting the impact of diagnostic methodology on ability to document DSM-5 symptoms. Utilizing combined ADOS/ADI-R data, 93 % of participants met DSM-5 criteria, which suggests likely continuity between DSM-IV and DSM-5 research samples characterized with these instruments in combination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.