Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23010485›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research2012

Multivariate prediction of emerging psychosis in adolescents at high risk for schizophrenia.

Jai Shah, Shaun M Eack, Debra M Montrose, Neeraj Tandon, Jean M Miewald, Konasale M Prasad, Matcheri S Keshavan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Classification of psychosis spectrum disorders using graph convolutional networks with structurally constrained functional connectomes.Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jai ShahBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Shaun M Eack
Debra M Montrose
Neeraj Tandon
Jean M Miewald
Konasale M Prasad
Matcheri S Keshavan
University of Pittsburgh · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Stability of Biotypes: a Longitudinal EvaluationR01MH078113 · NIMH · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KESHAVAN, MATCHERI S. · 2007 to 2019
$6.2M
Brain Maturation and Vulnerability to SchizophreniaR01MH064023 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KESHAVAN, MATCHERI S. · 2003 to 2008
$3.0M
CORTICAL PRUNING AND SCHIZOPHRENIAK02MH001180 · NIMH · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KESHAVAN, MATCHERI S. · 1995 to 2005
$648k
NIMH NIH HHS K02 MH001180NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064023NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH078113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate prediction of psychosis development in high-risk populations is an important but thus far elusive goal. Of the many diverse etiologic and risk factors identified thus far, few have been combined into prospective multivariate risk ascertainment models. We tested the predictive power of familial, neurobiological, socioenvironmental, cognitive and clinical risk factors through an integrative biopsychosocial model for emerging psychosis in young relatives at familial risk for schizophrenia.

methods96 young first- and second- degree relatives of schizophrenia probands were followed for an average of 2.38 (SD=0.98) years to examine their trajectory towards psychosis. Iterative structural equation modelling utilizing multiple etiologic and risk factors was employed to estimate their joint contribution to prediction of psychosis development.

resultsThe rate of conversion to psychosis over the study period was 12.5%. In the final model, clinical measures of schizotypy were directly predictive of conversion, with early (familial, biological, socioenvironmental) and cognitive risk factors indirectly predictive of psychosis through increased baseline clinical symptomatology. Our model provided an excellent fit to the observed data, with sensitivity of 0.17, specificity of 0.99, positive predictive value of 0.67 and negative predictive value of 0.89.

conclusionsIntegrative modeling of multivariate data from familial, neurobiological, socioenvironmental, cognitive and clinical domains represents a powerful approach to prediction of psychosis development. The high specificity and low sensitivity found using a combination of such variables suggests that their utility may be in confirmatory testing among already selected high-risk individuals, rather than for initial screening. These findings also highlight the importance of data from a broad array of etiologic and risk factors, even within a familial high-risk population. With further refinement and validation, such methods could form key components of early detection, intervention and prevention programs.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildCognition DisordersEcologyEnvironmentFamilyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuropsychological TestsPredictive Value of TestsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychotic DisordersRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID23010485
PMCPMC3483068
OpenAlexW2136665844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.