Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23009899›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental biology2012

Distinct spatiotemporal roles of hedgehog signalling during chick and mouse cranial base and axial skeleton development.

B Balczerski, S Zakaria, A S Tucker, A G Borycki, E Koyama, M Pacifici, P Francis-West

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Genetics of Chiari 1 Malformation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Making and shaping endochondral and intramembranous bones.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Neural crest and the origin of species-specific pattern.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2018
    Review
  8. The ADAMTS5 Metzincin Regulates Zebrafish Somite Differentiation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Skull base embryology: a multidisciplinary review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2014
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Angiogenesis and intramembranous osteogenesis.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2013
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

B BalczerskiDepartment of Craniofacial Development and Stem Cell Biology, King's College London, Guy's Tower, Floor 27, London Bridge, London SE1 9RT, UK.
S Zakaria
A S Tucker
A G Borycki
E Koyama
M Pacifici
P Francis-West

Funding

Pathogenic Mechanisms in Hereditary Multiple Exostoses SyndromeR01AR061758 · NIAMS · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI Maurizio Pacifici · 2011 to 2026
$6.3M
NIAMS NIH HHS 1R01AR061758NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR061758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cranial base exerts a supportive role for the brain and includes the occipital, sphenoid and ethmoid bones that arise from cartilaginous precursors in the early embryo. As the occipital bone and the posterior part of the sphenoid are mesoderm derivatives that arise in close proximity to the notochord and floor plate, it has been assumed that their development, like the axial skeleton, is dependent on Sonic hedgehog (Shh) and modulation of bone morphogenetic protein (Bmp) signalling. Here we examined the development of the cranial base in chick and mouse embryos to compare the molecular signals that are required for chondrogenic induction in the trunk and head. We found that Shh signalling is required but the molecular network controlling cranial base development is distinct from that in the trunk. In the absence of Shh, the presumptive cranial base did not undergo chondrogenic commitment as determined by the loss of Sox9 expression and there was a decrease in cell survival. In contrast, induction of the otic capsule occurred normally demonstrating that induction of the cranial base is uncoupled from formation of the sensory capsules. Lastly, we found that the early cranial mesoderm is refractory to Shh signalling, likely accounting for why development of the cranial base occurs after the axial skeleton. Our data reveal that cranial and axial skeletal induction is controlled by conserved, yet spatiotemporally distinct mechanisms that co-ordinate development of the cranial base with that of the cranial musculature and the pharyngeal arches.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalSignal TransductionAnimalsBone and BonesBone Morphogenetic ProteinsChick EmbryoChickensEmbryo, MammalianHedgehog ProteinsMesodermMiceSkullBone Morphogenetic ProteinsHedgehog Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23009899
PMCPMC3480222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.