Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23009866›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2013

Imaging the clear cell renal cell carcinoma proteome.

Todd M Morgan, Erin H Seeley, Oluwole Fadare, Richard M Caprioli, Peter E Clark

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Spatial proteomics: technical evolution and applications in cancer research.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Low C24-OH and C22-OH sulfatides in human renal cell carcinoma.Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Todd M MorganDepartment of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. Electronic address: tomorgan@med.umich.edu.
Erin H Seeley
Oluwole Fadare
Richard M Caprioli
Peter E Clark
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MATTHEW J TYSKA · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024975 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$45.7M
Training (pp 214-245)P41GM103391 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI REYZER, MICHELLE L · 2012 to 2020
$17.7M
Spatial Analysis of Molecules in Tissue using MALDI-MSR01GM058008 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CAPRIOLI, RICHARD M · 1998 to 2015
$5.8M
TRAIL Mediated Apoptosis in Renal Cell CarcinomaK08CA113452 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CLARK, PETER E · 2005 to 2009
$693k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA113452NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485NCI NIH HHS P30 CA68485NCRR NIH HHS 1UL1 RR024975NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024975NIGMS NIH HHS 5R01 GM58008NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103391NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA key barrier to identifying tissue biomarkers of clear cell renal cell carcinoma is the heterogeneity of protein expression in tissue. However, by providing spectra for every 0.05 mm(2) area of tissue, imaging mass spectrometry reveals the spatial distribution of peptides. We determined whether this approach could be used to identify and map protein signatures of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe constructed 2 tissue microarrays with 2 cores each of matched tumor and normal tissue from the nephrectomy specimens of 70 patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Samples were analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. In each tissue microarray peptide signatures were identified that differentiated cancer from normal tissue. The signatures were then cross validated. Mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry sequencing was performed to determine the identity of select, differentially expressed peptides. Immunohistochemistry was used for validation.

resultsIn each tissue microarray peptide signatures were identified that had 94.7% to 98.5% classification accuracy for each 0.05 mm(2) spot (spectrum) and 96.9% to 100% accuracy for each tissue core. Cross validation across tissue microarrays revealed a classification accuracy of 82.6% to 84.7% for each spot and 88.9% to 92.4% for each core. We identified vimentin, histone 2A.X and α-enolase as proteins with greater expression in cancer tissue. This was validated by immunohistochemistry.

conclusionsImaging mass spectrometry identified and mapped specific peptides that accurately distinguished malignant from normal renal tissue. This demonstrates its potential as a novel, high throughput approach to clear cell renal cell carcinoma biomarker discovery. Given the multiple pathways and known heterogeneity involved in tumors such as clear cell renal cell carcinoma, multiple peptide signatures that maintain their spatial relationships may outperform traditional protein biomarkers.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Renal CellFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKidney NeoplasmsMaleProteomeProteomicsReproducibility of ResultsSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationTandem Mass SpectrometryBiomarkers, TumorProteome

Identifiers

PMID23009866
PMCPMC3570618
OpenAlexW2035157420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.