ArticleThe Journal of urology2013
Imaging the clear cell renal cell carcinoma proteome.
Article in The Journal of urology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spatial proteomics: technical evolution and applications in cancer research.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Article
- Using the Synergy between HPLC-MS and MALDI-MS Imaging to Explore the Lipidomics of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Analytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers in Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Absolute quantitative proteomics using the total protein approach to identify novel clinical immunohistochemical markers in renal neoplasms.BMC medicine · 2021Article
- Cell-blocks and other ancillary studies (including molecular genetic tests and proteomics).CytoJournal · 2021Review
- Effect of MALDI matrices on lipid analyses of biological tissues using MALDI-2 postionization mass spectrometry.Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS · 2020Article
- Challenges and opportunities in the proteomic characterization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): A critical step towards the personalized care of renal cancers.Seminars in cancer biology · 2019Review
- Mass Spectrometry Imaging Can Distinguish on a Proteomic Level Between Proliferative Nodules Within a Benign Congenital Nevus and Malignant Melanoma.The American Journal of dermatopathology · 2017Article
- Label-free molecular imaging of the kidney.Kidney international · 2017Review
- Proteomics and peptidomics: moving toward precision medicine in urological malignancies.Oncotarget · 2016Review
- Ambient ionization mass spectrometric analysis of human surgical specimens to distinguish renal cell carcinoma from healthy renal tissue.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2016Article
- Proteotranscriptomic Analysis Reveals Stage Specific Changes in the Molecular Landscape of Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.PloS one · 2016Article
- Alpha-enolase is a potential prognostic marker in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2015Article
- Identification of Protein Markers Specific for Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Imaging Mass Spectrometry.Molecules and cells · 2015Article
- On-tissue localization of ceramides and other sphingolipids by MALDI mass spectrometry imaging.Analytical chemistry · 2014Article
- Low C24-OH and C22-OH sulfatides in human renal cell carcinoma.Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS · 2014Article
- Article
- MALDI imaging mass spectrometry profiling of proteins and lipids in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Proteomics · 2014Article
- Applications of mass spectrometry for quantitative protein analysis in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues.Proteomics · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeA key barrier to identifying tissue biomarkers of clear cell renal cell carcinoma is the heterogeneity of protein expression in tissue. However, by providing spectra for every 0.05 mm(2) area of tissue, imaging mass spectrometry reveals the spatial distribution of peptides. We determined whether this approach could be used to identify and map protein signatures of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe constructed 2 tissue microarrays with 2 cores each of matched tumor and normal tissue from the nephrectomy specimens of 70 patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Samples were analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. In each tissue microarray peptide signatures were identified that differentiated cancer from normal tissue. The signatures were then cross validated. Mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry sequencing was performed to determine the identity of select, differentially expressed peptides. Immunohistochemistry was used for validation.
resultsIn each tissue microarray peptide signatures were identified that had 94.7% to 98.5% classification accuracy for each 0.05 mm(2) spot (spectrum) and 96.9% to 100% accuracy for each tissue core. Cross validation across tissue microarrays revealed a classification accuracy of 82.6% to 84.7% for each spot and 88.9% to 92.4% for each core. We identified vimentin, histone 2A.X and α-enolase as proteins with greater expression in cancer tissue. This was validated by immunohistochemistry.
conclusionsImaging mass spectrometry identified and mapped specific peptides that accurately distinguished malignant from normal renal tissue. This demonstrates its potential as a novel, high throughput approach to clear cell renal cell carcinoma biomarker discovery. Given the multiple pathways and known heterogeneity involved in tumors such as clear cell renal cell carcinoma, multiple peptide signatures that maintain their spatial relationships may outperform traditional protein biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.