Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23009744›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2012

A qualitative study using traditional community assemblies to investigate community perspectives on informed consent and research participation in western Kenya.

Rachel Vreeman, Eunice Kamaara, Allan Kamanda, David Ayuku, Winstone Nyandiko, Lukoye Atwoli, Samuel Ayaya, Peter Gisore, Michael Scanlon, Paula Braitstein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Integrating stakeholder feedback in translational genomics research: an ethnographic analysis of a study protocol's evolution.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rachel VreemanDepartment of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, 705 Riley Hospital Drive, Room 5900, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA. rvreeman@iupui.edu
Eunice Kamaara
Allan Kamanda
David Ayuku
Winstone Nyandiko
Lukoye Atwoli
Samuel Ayaya
Peter Gisore
Michael Scanlon
Paula Braitstein
Moi University · KEAMPATH · KEIndiana University School of MedicineRegenstrief Institute · US

Funding

Orphaned & Separated Children's Assessment Related to their Health & Well-BeingR01HD060478 · NICHD · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI BRAITSTEIN, PAULA KARINA ALICE, SIDLE, JOHN E · 2009 to 2019
$5.4M
Development of an Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence Measure for PediatricsK23MH087225 · NIMH · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI VREEMAN, RACHEL CHRISTINE · 2009 to 2013
$862k
NICHD NIH HHS 1R01HD060478-01A1NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD060478NIMH NIH HHS 1K23MH087225-01PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternational collaborators face challenges in the design and implementation of ethical biomedical research. Evaluating community understanding of research and processes like informed consent may enable researchers to better protect research participants in a particular setting; however, there exist few studies examining community perspectives in health research, particularly in resource-limited settings, or strategies for engaging the community in research processes. Our goal was to inform ethical research practice in a biomedical research setting in western Kenya and similar resource-limited settings.

methodsWe sought to use mabaraza, traditional East African community assemblies, in a qualitative study to understand community perspectives on biomedical research and informed consent within a collaborative, multinational research network in western Kenya. Analyses included manual, progressive coding of transcripts from mabaraza to identify emerging central concepts.

resultsOur findings from two mabaraza with 108 community members revealed that, while participants understood some principles of biomedical research, they emphasized perceived benefits from participation in research over potential risks. Many community members equated health research with HIV testing or care, which may be explained in part by the setting of this particular study. In addition to valuing informed consent as understanding and accepting a role in research activities, participants endorsed an increased role for the community in making decisions about research participation, especially in the case of children, through a process of community consent.

conclusionsOur study suggests that international biomedical research must account for community understanding of research and informed consent, particularly when involving children. Moreover, traditional community forums, such as mabaraza in East Africa, can be used effectively to gather these data and may serve as a forum to further engage communities in community consent and other aspects of research.

Indexed as

ComprehensionInformed ConsentResidence CharacteristicsBiomedical ResearchClinical Trials as TopicEthics, ResearchHIV InfectionsHuman ExperimentationHumansKenyaPatient SelectionQualitative ResearchResearch DesignResearch SubjectsThird-Party Consent

Identifiers

PMID23009744
PMCPMC3515354
OpenAlexW2047073435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.