ArticleBMC cancer2012
A new score predicting the survival of patients with spinal cord compression from myeloma.
Article in BMC cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does Duration of Symptoms in Metastatic Spine Disease Affect Recovery and Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Global spine journal · 2026Review
- Review
- Pulmonary Function in Patients with Solitary Spinal Metastases: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Evolution of surgical treatment of metastatic spine tumors.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Review
- First statement on preparation for the COVID-19 pandemic in large German Speaking University-based radiation oncology departments.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2020Review
- Baseline Metabolic Risk Score and Postsurgical Esophageal Cancer-Specific Mortality: The Fujian Prospective Investigation of Cancer (FIESTA) Study.Journal of Cancer · 2018Article
- A predictive tool particularly designed for elderly myeloma patients presenting with spinal cord compression.BMC cancer · 2016Article
- Inpatient rehabilitation outcomes in patients with malignant spinal cord compression compared to other non-traumatic spinal cord injury: A population based study.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2015Article
- A new instrument for estimation of survival in elderly patients irradiated for metastatic spinal cord compression from breast cancer.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2015Article
- A validated score estimating ambulatory status following radiotherapy of elderly patients for metastatic spinal cord compression.BMC cancer · 2014Article
- A New Prognostic Instrument Specifically Designed for Patients Irradiated for Recurrent Carcinoma of the Bladder.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study was performed to create and validate a scoring system for the survival of patients with malignant spinal cord compression (SCC) from myeloma.
methodsOf the entire cohort (N = 216), 108 patients were assigned to a test group and 108 patients to a validation group. In the test group, nine pre-treatment factors including age, gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS), number of involved vertebrae, ambulatory status prior to radiotherapy, other bone lesions, extraosseous lesions, interval from first diagnosis of myeloma to radiotherapy of SCC, and the time developing motor deficits were retrospectively analyzed.
resultsOn univariate analysis, improved survival was associated with ECOG-PS 1-2 (p = 0.006), being ambulatory (p = 0.005), and absence of other bone lesions (p = 0.019). On multivariate analysis, ECOG-PS (p = 0.036) and ambulatory status (p = 0.037) were significant; other bone lesions showed a strong trend (p = 0.06). These factors were included in the score. The score for each factor was determined by dividing the 12-month survival rate (in%) by 10. The total risk score was the sum of the three factor scores and ranged from 19 to 24 points. Three prognostic groups were designed with the following 12-month survival rates: 49% for 19-20 points, 74% for 21-23 points, and 93% for 24 points (p= 0.002). In the validation group, the 12-month survival rates were 51%, 80%, and 90%, respectively (p < 0.001).
conclusionsThis score appears reproducible, because the 12-month survival rates of both the test and the validation group were very similar. This new survival score can help personalize the treatment of patients with SCC from myeloma and can be of benefit when counseling patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.