Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23008383›Full record

ReviewNeurology2012

How well do blood flow imaging and collaterals on angiography predict brain at risk?

David S Liebeskind, Nerses Sanossian

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Circle of Willis configuration as a determinant of intracranial dolichoectasia.Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David S LiebeskindUCLA Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. davidliebeskind@yahoo.com
Nerses Sanossian
University of Southern California · US

Funding

Modeling of Collateral Perfusion in the Ischemic BrainK24NS072272 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LIEBESKIND, DAVID SIGMUND · 2011 to 2015
$939k
Collateral Circulation in Acute Ischemic StrokeK23NS054084 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LIEBESKIND, DAVID SIGMUND · 2006 to 2010
$764k
NINDS NIH HHS K23NS054084NINDS NIH HHS K24 NS072272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As endovascular therapy emerges as a principal approach to restore blood flow in the setting of acute stroke, better methods of patient selection need to be developed. Noninvasive studies of blood flow and angiographic results acquired prior to endovascular therapy may help determine areas of brain at risk of infarction and hemorrhagic transformation, both largely determined by the severity of cerebral ischemia. Pathophysiologic measures of collateral flow and perfusion that characterize ischemic severity prior to revascularization may optimize acute stroke decision-making, currently driven by arbitrary time parameters derived from population studies devoid of imaging.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood Flow VelocityCerebral AngiographyCollateral CirculationHumansNeuroimagingPredictive Value of TestsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID23008383
PMCPMC4109234
OpenAlexW2160767068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.