Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23008246›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2013

A multichannel Markov random field framework for tumor segmentation with an application to classification of gene expression-based breast cancer recurrence risk.

Ahmed B Ashraf, Sara C Gavenonis, Dania Daye, Carolyn Mies, Mark A Rosen, Despina Kontos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Gene Expression-Assisted Cancer Prediction Techniques.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Background, current role, and potential applications of radiogenomics.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Validation of a method for retroperitoneal tumor segmentation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahmed B AshrafComputational Breast Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. ahmed.ashraf@uphs.upenn.edu
Sara C Gavenonis
Dania Daye
Carolyn Mies
Mark A Rosen
Despina Kontos
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARDUL1RR024134 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FITZGERALD, GARRET A · 2006 to 2011
$70.4M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024134NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR024134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a methodological framework for multichannel Markov random fields (MRFs). We show that conditional independence allows loopy belief propagation to solve a multichannel MRF as a single channel MRF. We use conditional mutual information to search for features that satisfy conditional independence assumptions. Using this framework we incorporate kinetic feature maps derived from breast dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as observation channels in MRF for tumor segmentation. Our algorithm based on multichannel MRF achieves an receiver operating characteristic area under curve (AUC) of 0.97 for tumor segmentation when using a radiologist's manual delineation as ground truth. Single channel MRF based on the best feature chosen from the same pool of features as used by the multichannel MRF achieved a lower AUC of 0.89. We also present a comparison against the well established normalized cuts segmentation algorithm along with commonly used approaches for breast tumor segmentation including fuzzy C-means (FCM) and the more recent method of running FCM on enhancement variance features (FCM-VES). These previous methods give a lower AUC of 0.92, 0.88, and 0.60, respectively. Finally, we also investigate the role of superior segmentation in feature extraction and tumor characterization. Specifically, we examine the effect of improved segmentation on predicting the probability of breast cancer recurrence as determined by a validated tumor gene expression assay. We demonstrate that an support vector machine classifier trained on kinetic statistics extracted from tumors as segmented by our algorithm gives a significant improvement in distinguishing between women with high and low recurrence risk, giving an AUC of 0.88 as compared to 0.79, 0.76, 0.75, and 0.66 when using normalized cuts, single channel MRF, FCM, and FCM-VES, respectively, for segmentation.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveBreast NeoplasmsComputational BiologyFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedKineticsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMarkov ChainsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID23008246
PMCPMC4197832
OpenAlexW2059414129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.