ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2013
Genetic engineering of juvenile human chondrocytes improves scaffold-free mosaic neocartilage grafts.
Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Equine Dental Pulp Connective Tissue Particles Reduced Lameness in Horses in a Controlled Clinical Trial.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2017Article
- Fetal vs adult mesenchymal stem cells achieve greater gene expression, but less osteoinduction.World journal of stem cells · 2015Article
- Regulation of scleral fibroblast differentiation by bone morphogenetic protein-2.International journal of ophthalmology · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent cartilage transplantation techniques achieve suboptimal restoration and rely on patient donor cells or living grafts of chondrocytes. PURPOSE: We sought to enhance allogeneic grafts by testing mosaics of genetically engineered and naïve juvenile human chondrocytes (jCh).
methodsWe obtained specimens from three humans and performed three experiments (two in vitro, one in vivo). We compared neocartilage with and without (1) supplemented serum-free medium (chondrocyte differentiation medium [CDM]), (2) adenoviral BMP-2 (AdBMP-2) transduction, and (3) varying ratios (0.1-1) of transduced and naïve jCh. We compared (4) healing with mosaic grafts with naïve neocartilage or marrow stimulation in immunosuppressed rats. For each of 10 in vitro treatment groups, we had six replicates for each human, and for each of three in vivo treatment groups, we had four replicates for one human. We scored the histology with the semiquantitative Bern score.
resultsAdBMP-2 and naïve neocartilage growth in CDM were histologically superior (Bern score, 5.2 versus 3.7; 8.0 versus 1.8) and size (8.0 versus 6.1; 7.9 versus 2.2 mg) to standard medium. In CDM, AdBMP-2 decreased viability (76% versus 90%), but increased BMP-2 production (619 ng/mL versus 43 pg/mL). Ten percent and 25% AdBMP-2 transduction had Bern scores of 6.8 and 6.5 and viability of 84% and 83%, respectively. Twenty-five percent mosaic grafts provided better healing histologically than marrow stimulation or naive neocartilage.
conclusionsLow-level AdBMP-2 and CDM augment neocartilage parameters in vitro and vivo. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Genetic augmentation of jCh and creation of mosaic neocartilage may improve graft viability and articular healing compared with naïve neocartilage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.