Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23007640›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2012

Fluorescent in situ hybridization on mitotic chromosomes of mosquitoes.

Vladimir A Timoshevskiy, Atashi Sharma, Igor V Sharakhov, Maria V Sharakhova

Open access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Biparental inheritance of germline-specific chromosomes in the sea lamprey and their roles in oocytes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vladimir A TimoshevskiyDepartment of Entomology, Virginia Tech, USA.
Atashi Sharma
Igor V Sharakhov
Maria V Sharakhova
Virginia Tech · US

Funding

Physical mapping of Aedes aegypti genomeR21AI088035 · NIAID · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI SHARAKHOVA, MARIA · 2010 to 2011
$433k
Highly finished chromosome-based genome assembly for Anopheles gambiaeR21AI094289 · NIAID · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI SHARAKHOV, IGOR V · 2011 to 2012
$420k
NIAID NIH HHS 1R21 AI094289-01NIAID NIH HHS 1R21 AI88035-01NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI088035NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI094289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) is a technique routinely used by many laboratories to determine the chromosomal position of DNA and RNA probes. One important application of this method is the development of high-quality physical maps useful for improving the genome assemblies for various organisms. The natural banding pattern of polytene and mitotic chromosomes provides guidance for the precise ordering and orientation of the genomic supercontigs. Among the three mosquito genera, namely Anopheles, Aedes, and Culex, a well-established chromosome-based mapping technique has been developed only for Anopheles, whose members possess readable polytene chromosomes. As a result of genome mapping efforts, 88% of the An. gambiae genome has been placed to precise chromosome positions. Two other mosquito genera, Aedes and Culex, have poorly polytenized chromosomes because of significant overrepresentation of transposable elements in their genomes. Only 31 and 9% of the genomic supercontings have been assigned without order or orientation to chromosomes of Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus, respectively. Mitotic chromosome preparation for these two species had previously been limited to brain ganglia and cell lines. However, chromosome slides prepared from the brain ganglia of mosquitoes usually contain low numbers of metaphase plates. Also, although a FISH technique has been developed for mitotic chromosomes from a cell line of Ae. aegypti, the accumulation of multiple chromosomal rearrangements in cell line chromosomes makes them useless for genome mapping. Here we describe a simple, robust technique for obtaining high-quality mitotic chromosome preparations from imaginal discs (IDs) of 4th instar larvae which can be used for all three genera of mosquitoes. A standard FISH protocol is optimized for using BAC clones of genomic DNA as a probe on mitotic chromosomes of Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus, and for utilizing an intergenic spacer (IGS) region of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) as a probe on An. gambiae chromosomes. In addition to physical mapping, the developed technique can be applied to population cytogenetics and chromosome taxonomy/systematics of mosquitoes and other insect groups.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromosomes, InsectCulicidaeFemaleIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMitosis

Identifiers

PMID23007640
PMCPMC3671840
OpenAlexW1981072131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.